(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > step 1: test existing configuration with crypt32 set to builtin in winecfg.
> > RESULT: Online banking works. No errors and no 100% CPU usage.
>
> Which shows the problem is in native crypt32.
I'm sorry. I made a TYPO! Please forgive me. Here is my CORRECTED report:
step 1: test existing configuration with crypt32 set to NATIVE in winecfg.
RESULT: Online banking works. No errors and no 100% CPU usage.
step 2: Set crypt32 to builtin in winecfg as per comment #24 From Austin English.
RESULT: Online banking fails with "An unexpected communication error occurred.
(OFXIE-2146869247). However, no 100% CPU usage occurred.
Therefore, this change does not explain the original problem AFAIK. Certainly, the original problem was not reproduced in this test.
I do not believe this shows the 100% CPU problem is in native crypt32.
(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > step 1: test existing configuration with crypt32 set to builtin in winecfg.
> > RESULT: Online banking works. No errors and no 100% CPU usage.
>
> Which shows the problem is in native crypt32.
I'm sorry. I made a TYPO! Please forgive me. Here is my CORRECTED report:
step 1: test existing configuration with crypt32 set to NATIVE in winecfg.
RESULT: Online banking works. No errors and no 100% CPU usage.
step 2: Set crypt32 to builtin in winecfg as per comment #24 From Austin English.
RESULT: Online banking fails with "An unexpected communication error occurred.
(OFXIE-2146869247). However, no 100% CPU usage occurred.
Therefore, this change does not explain the original problem AFAIK. Certainly, the original problem was not reproduced in this test.
I do not believe this shows the 100% CPU problem is in native crypt32.