wifi radar applet crashes on logout

[[e-mail]]

Binary package hint: wifi-radar

synaptic exit for installing wi-fi radar

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Oct 30 09:00:10 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/wifi-radar
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: wifi-radar 2.0.s05-1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python -OO /usr/sbin/wifi-radar -d
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.42-generic
PythonArgs: ['/usr/sbin/wifi-radar', '-d']
SourcePackage: wifi-radar
Title: wifi-radar crashed with SyntaxError in read()
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686
UserGroups:

[Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)]

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

[Sean Robinson (seankrobinson)]

I suspect this is a variation on bug 414399 or bug 454744. Since you seem to have APs configured from WiFi Radar 1.9.9, I recommend you rename /etc/wifi-radar/wifi-radar.conf to a new name, so that it can be checked when configuring WR v2.0.

[Apport retracing service (apport)]

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #444256, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

[Philip Muškovac (yofel)]

Not a dup of bug #444256 as that's about a unexpected EOF, not about an invalid synatx.

[dino99 (9d9)]

This version is outdated and no more supported