2007-02-16 14:31:09 |
Thomas Schwinge |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2007-02-16 14:38:42 |
Laurent Bigonville |
gnome-terminal: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
2007-02-16 14:38:42 |
Laurent Bigonville |
gnome-terminal: statusexplanation |
|
I noticed the same problem here |
|
2007-02-21 16:40:46 |
Sslaxx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'Corruption.png' (Visual of screen corruption using GNOME Terminal 2.17.91.) |
2007-02-22 13:43:32 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-terminal: importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
2007-02-22 13:43:32 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-terminal: assignee |
|
desktop-bugs |
|
2007-02-22 13:43:32 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-terminal: statusexplanation |
I noticed the same problem here |
|
|
2007-02-27 17:39:45 |
Sslaxx |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'Corrupt2.png' (Screen corruption, GNOME Terminal 2.17.92/VTE 0.15.4.) |
2007-02-27 18:05:25 |
Laurent Bigonville |
vte: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Released |
|
2007-02-27 18:05:25 |
Laurent Bigonville |
vte: statusexplanation |
|
Fixed in 1:0.15.4-0ubuntu1 according to changelog. Maybe open a new bug for the terminal corruption |
|
2007-02-27 18:05:32 |
Laurent Bigonville |
gnome-terminal: status |
Unconfirmed |
Rejected |
|
2007-02-27 18:05:32 |
Laurent Bigonville |
gnome-terminal: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
2007-03-11 11:42:39 |
Sebastien Bacher |
vte: status |
Fix Released |
Confirmed |
|
2007-03-11 11:42:39 |
Sebastien Bacher |
vte: statusexplanation |
Fixed in 1:0.15.4-0ubuntu1 according to changelog. Maybe open a new bug for the terminal corruption |
|
|
2007-04-01 05:55:28 |
Martin Pool |
bug |
|
|
added attachment '2007-04-01-154826_1680x1050_scrot.png' (2007-04-01-154826_1680x1050_scrot.png) |
2007-04-13 12:06:32 |
Sebastien Bacher |
vte: statusexplanation |
|
Dropping the milestone, we are too near of 7.04 to do changes on that now. Does anybody still get the bug or is that been fixed with updates? Do you have an easy way to trigger it, we might get a fix to feisty-updates if that's still happening |
|
2007-04-16 05:21:16 |
Martin Pool |
bug |
|
|
added attachment '2007-04-16-151712_1680x1050_scrot.png' (screenshot) |
2007-06-17 09:41:07 |
Sebastien Bacher |
vte: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Released |
|
2007-06-17 09:41:07 |
Sebastien Bacher |
vte: statusexplanation |
Dropping the milestone, we are too near of 7.04 to do changes on that now. Does anybody still get the bug or is that been fixed with updates? Do you have an easy way to trigger it, we might get a fix to feisty-updates if that's still happening |
The gutsy version works fine, marking fixed. You can open a feisty-backport bug if you want |
|
2007-06-17 13:18:05 |
Matti Lindell |
bug |
|
|
assigned to feisty-backports (upstream) |
2007-06-25 12:34:53 |
Valentin Rocher |
feisty-backports: status |
New |
Invalid |
|
2007-06-25 12:34:53 |
Valentin Rocher |
feisty-backports: statusexplanation |
|
-> Considering build-dep gnome-pkg-tools (>= 0.10)
Tried versions: 0.9.3
-> Does not satisfy version, not trying |
|
2007-06-25 13:04:41 |
Valentin Rocher |
feisty-backports: status |
Invalid |
Incomplete |
|
2007-06-25 13:04:41 |
Valentin Rocher |
feisty-backports: statusexplanation |
-> Considering build-dep gnome-pkg-tools (>= 0.10)
Tried versions: 0.9.3
-> Does not satisfy version, not trying |
With gnome-pkg-tools backported, it b/i/r well.
Putting it in Incomplete until someone accpets gnome-pkg-tools bug. |
|
2007-08-02 03:26:09 |
Scott Kitterman |
feisty-backports: status |
Incomplete |
Won't Fix |
|
2007-08-02 03:26:09 |
Scott Kitterman |
feisty-backports: statusexplanation |
With gnome-pkg-tools backported, it b/i/r well.
Putting it in Incomplete until someone accpets gnome-pkg-tools bug. |
gnome-terminal
Reverse Depends:
|gnome-panel
wajig
|sawfish
meta-ul-server-gui
meta-ul-desktop-base
gnome-rdp
gnome-core
anjuta
ubuntu-desktop
gnome-terminal-data
gnome-terminal-data
|gnome-panel
edubuntu-desktop
I think this is to much a core application for a safe backport. Certainly for a backport for whatever is left of the issue that may or may not be related to this package. Backports is intended to bring new features, not bug fixes. |
|