VirtualBox crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #1273773 reported by Derick Fynn
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #1371494: VirtualBox crashed with SIGSEGV. Edit Remove
260
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
virtualbox (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

   broken

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: virtualbox-qt 4.3.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-5.20-generic 3.13.0
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-5-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.13.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Mon Jan 27 01:27:31 2014
Disassembly: => 0x35: Cannot access memory at address 0x35
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-03-23 (311 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120823.1)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox --comment Windows7 --startvm 277231d8-8d6a-43c1-a7fc-ca8b31f01e02 --no-startvm-errormsgbox
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_ZA:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=en_ZA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x35: Cannot access memory at address 0x35
 PC (0x00000035) not located in a known VMA region (needed executable region)!
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: executing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: virtualbox
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOM.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/components/VBoxXPCOMIPCC.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOM.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOM.so
Title: VirtualBox crashed with SIGSEGV
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-01-26 (1 days ago)
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
Derick Fynn (dcfynn) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1273340, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private Security → Public Security
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public Security information  
Everyone can see this security related information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.