virtualbox-dkms 4.2.16-dfsg-3ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

Bug #1255394 reported by Daryl Hughes
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
virtualbox (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This Bug was caused by me Testing Kernel 3.13
3.13 didn't boot up properly just showed Black screen with X as the Mouse arrow and the Kernel was not in a Virtual Box is was in the Main computer system there are 3 Bugs I collected on this will have them below all 3 is the same not sure if it was of the same thing of kernel 3.13 But could of effected something if it brought 3 Report problems

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: virtualbox-dkms 4.2.16-dfsg-3ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.12.0-4.10-generic 3.12.1
Uname: Linux 3.12.0-4-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.12.7-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-031300rc1-generic
Date: Tue Nov 26 22:41:48 2013
DuplicateSignature: dkms:virtualbox-dkms:4.2.16-dfsg-3ubuntu1:/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.2.16/build/vboxdrv/r0drv/linux/memobj-r0drv-linux.c:1539:26: error: ‘struct mm_struct’ has no member named ‘numa_next_reset’
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-11-12 (14 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Alpha amd64 (20131111)
PackageArchitecture: all
PackageVersion: 4.2.16-dfsg-3ubuntu1
SourcePackage: virtualbox
Title: virtualbox-dkms 4.2.16-dfsg-3ubuntu1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Daryl Hughes (zorw2016) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Daryl Hughes (zorw2016) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Daryl Hughes (zorw2016) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1255393, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.