vino documentation missing or incorrect

Bug #292994 reported by Detlef Lechner
20
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
vino (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: vino

"~$ man vino-preferences; No manual entry for vino-preferences"
"~$ man vino-server; No manual entry for vino-server"
"~$ uname -r; 2.6.24-21-generic"
"~$ lsb_release -rd; Description: Ubuntu 8.04.1; Release: 8.04."
"~$ apt-cache policy packagename; apt-cache policy vino
vino:
  Installiert:2.22.2-0ubuntu1
  Mögliche Pakete:2.22.2-0ubuntu1
  Versions-Tabelle:
 *** 2.22.2-0ubuntu1 0
        500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.22.1-1 0
        500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages"

Revision history for this message
Louis (louiswolf) wrote :

Is someone waiting on a user confirmation for this? Confirmed.

Also see reports 394811 (no docs) and 330310 (no logs).

Revision history for this message
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) wrote :

No, we're waiting on someone to write them. You're welcome to do so!

Changed in vino (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Changed in vino (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
summary: - 'man vino-server' and 'man vino-preferences' missing
+ vino documentation missing or incorrect
Revision history for this message
Paul Natsuo Kishimoto (khaeru) wrote :

I disagree that this is a wishlist item. There is rudimentary documentation available:

$ /usr/lib/vino/vino-server -h
Usage:
  vino-server [OPTION...] - VNC Server for GNOME

Help Options:
  -h, --help Show help options
  --help-all Show all help options
  --help-gtk Show GTK+ Options
  --help-sm-client Show session management options

Application Options:
  --display=DISPLAY X display to use

...but this documentation is *wrong*; that is, the following two commands do not have the same effect:

$ /usr/lib/vino/vino-server --display=:0.0
$ DISPLAY=:0.0 /usr/lib/vino/vino-server

The latter works; the former does not. Even if no manpages are added (though they should be), the incorrect existing documentation is a bug.

This was raised in the forums at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1017746

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.