Activity log for bug #432070

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2009-09-17 19:32:40 Daniel Hahler bug added bug
2009-09-17 19:33:47 Daniel Hahler attachment added dscf2274.jpg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31982913/dscf2274.jpg
2009-09-17 19:35:10 Daniel Hahler attachment added dscf2275.jpg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31982949/dscf2275.jpg
2009-09-17 19:35:58 Daniel Hahler attachment added dscf2276.jpg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31982969/dscf2276.jpg
2009-09-17 19:36:46 Daniel Hahler attachment added dscf2277.jpg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31983056/dscf2277.jpg
2009-09-17 19:37:47 Daniel Hahler attachment added dscf2278.jpg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31983072/dscf2278.jpg
2009-09-17 19:38:38 Daniel Hahler attachment added dscf2279.jpg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31983096/dscf2279.jpg
2009-09-17 19:39:26 Daniel Hahler summary UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: fails to boot UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: fails to boot ("last mount time is in the future")
2009-09-17 19:40:44 Daniel Hahler description Binary package hint: mountall I get "UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY" on booting, then it fails to start or provide me a shell. I had this happening since some days already: the first boot would tell me that fsck failed, but a reboot (straight after pressing Ctrl-D) went through without any problems. Now (IIRC) Ctrl-D did not do anything. I've used Alt-SysRq-K, which caused a kernel panic ("trying to kill init"). Binary package hint: mountall I get "UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY" on booting, then it fails to start or provide me a shell. I had this happening since some days already: the first boot would tell me that fsck failed, but a reboot (straight after pressing Ctrl-D) went through without any problems. Now (IIRC) Ctrl-D did not do anything. I've used Alt-SysRq-K, which caused a kernel panic ("trying to kill init"). I'm not sure if all that FAIL is caused by "Superblock last mount time is in the future". It's mentioned in the e2fsprogs changelog at least: * E2fsck will now print much fuller information when the last mount time or last written time is in the future, since most people can't seem to believe their distribution has buggy init scripts, or they have a failed CMOS/RTS clock battery.
2009-09-17 20:07:19 Scott James Remnant (Canonical) mountall (Ubuntu): importance Undecided Medium
2009-09-17 20:07:19 Scott James Remnant (Canonical) mountall (Ubuntu): status New Incomplete
2009-09-19 00:33:15 Glenn Brumfield attachment added Karmic_alpha6.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32047186/Karmic_alpha6.png
2009-09-19 02:56:03 Daniel Hahler affects mountall (Ubuntu) e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
2009-09-19 03:29:30 Daniel Hahler affects e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) ubuntu
2009-09-19 03:29:47 Daniel Hahler ubuntu: status Incomplete Triaged
2009-09-19 13:50:35 Daniel Hahler description Binary package hint: mountall I get "UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY" on booting, then it fails to start or provide me a shell. I had this happening since some days already: the first boot would tell me that fsck failed, but a reboot (straight after pressing Ctrl-D) went through without any problems. Now (IIRC) Ctrl-D did not do anything. I've used Alt-SysRq-K, which caused a kernel panic ("trying to kill init"). I'm not sure if all that FAIL is caused by "Superblock last mount time is in the future". It's mentioned in the e2fsprogs changelog at least: * E2fsck will now print much fuller information when the last mount time or last written time is in the future, since most people can't seem to believe their distribution has buggy init scripts, or they have a failed CMOS/RTS clock battery. Binary package hint: mountall I get "UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY" on booting, then it fails to start or provide me a shell. I had this happening since some days already: the first boot would tell me that fsck failed, but a reboot (straight after pressing Ctrl-D) went through without any problems. Now (IIRC) Ctrl-D did not do anything. I've used Alt-SysRq-K, which caused a kernel panic ("trying to kill init"). I'm not sure if all that FAIL is caused by "Superblock last mount time is in the future". It's mentioned in the e2fsprogs changelog at least: * E2fsck will now print much fuller information when the last mount time or last written time is in the future, since most people can't seem to believe their distribution has buggy init scripts, or they have a failed CMOS/RTS clock battery. WORKAROUND: Adding the following to "[options]" in /etc/e2fsck.conf, running update-initramfs and rebooting fixed it for me: buggy_init_scripts = 1
2009-09-19 18:17:58 MichalM removed subscriber MichalM
2009-09-19 19:12:23 Xandros Pilosa affects ubuntu mountall (Ubuntu)
2009-09-19 19:20:57 Xandros Pilosa affects mountall (Ubuntu) linux (Ubuntu)
2009-09-22 00:31:53 Scott James Remnant (Canonical) linux (Ubuntu): status Triaged Invalid
2009-10-07 21:56:24 Daniel Hahler affects linux (Ubuntu) mountall (Ubuntu)
2009-10-07 21:56:24 Daniel Hahler mountall (Ubuntu): status Invalid Triaged
2009-10-07 23:03:58 Scott James Remnant (Canonical) affects mountall (Ubuntu) util-linux (Ubuntu)
2009-10-12 12:31:51 Scott James Remnant (Canonical) marked as duplicate 268808
2012-09-11 21:48:24 Glenn Brumfield removed subscriber Glenn Brumfield