Remove sreadahead transitional package

Bug #545596 reported by PresuntoRJ on 2010-03-23
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ureadahead (Ubuntu)
Low
Bilal Akhtar

Bug Description

Binary package hint: ureadahead

I not really sure if that is a ureadahead issue or do-release-upgrade -d issue from 9.10 to 10.04, but when I did the upgrade on a testing system they ended up both being installed together in my machine, making it impoooosibly sloooow and full of error in my logs.

when I have found out that #1, they were not meant to be together and #2, I could simply remove sreadahead, I did

not sure if I have any traces, but I think I can try the upgrade in another system soon if really necessary

either the fix should be in the upgrade script it self, to consider removing the decrypted package during the execution, or the deg package of the ureadahead could verify the previously installed offender and get read of it...

why did they change names anyway? they look so similar to me (in function at least)... could they not be considered a newer version of whatever to be replaced by numbering system in dkpg alone?

well, feel free to ask for logs and checks, I'll do my best to get them and post back here.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: de1ce24add13ff88e3d6e8b8b1849388
CheckboxSystem: 2e4ab5fb96eeb897d439b8ef1239668e
Date: Tue Mar 23 20:40:40 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027)
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl
PackDump: Error: command ['ureadahead', '--dump'] failed with exit code 4: ureadahead:/var/lib/ureadahead/pack: Permission denied
PackDumpHost: Error: command ['ureadahead', '--dump'] failed with exit code 4: ureadahead:/var/lib/ureadahead/pack: Permission denied
Package: ureadahead 0.100.0-4.1
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=pt_BR:pt:pt_PT
 LANG=pt_BR.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
SourcePackage: ureadahead
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic x86_64

Related branches

PresuntoRJ (fabio-tleitao) wrote :

The sreadahead package left on your system is not actually sreadahead, but a package intended to clean up sreadahead's data files on upgrade - it's intended to be safely removed.

Leaving this bug open to remind us that the package can be dropped in Maverick

summary: - do-relase-upgrade to 10.04 keeps sreadahead together with ureadahead
+ Remove sreadahead transitional package
Changed in ureadahead (Ubuntu):
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → Low
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

I am fixing this bug.

Changed in ureadahead (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar)
status: Triaged → In Progress
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Thanks Bilal! I merged your branch. I just reverted --sourcedir debian/ureadahead, that's conceptually backwards. (This now doesn't need dh_install in the first place any more, as you removed the .install file).

Changed in ureadahead (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ureadahead - 0.100.0-9

---------------
ureadahead (0.100.0-9) natty; urgency=low

  [ Bilal Akhtar ]
  * Removed sreadahead transitional package and its postinst, postrm,
    preinst and install files. (LP: #545596)
  * Passed --sourcedir argument to dh_install
  * Removed dh_gencontrol calls for package sreadahead.

  [ Martin Pitt ]
  * src/Makefile.{am,in}: Add missing -lrt, as pack.c uses clock_gettime.
    Fixes building with gcc 4.5.
  * debian/rules: Revert --sourcedir passing, it's not necessary.
  * debian/rules: Don't install apport hook as executable.
  * debian/copyright: Point to versioned GPL-2 file.
  * debian/control: Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1.
 -- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:29:40 +0100

Changed in ureadahead (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers