Activity log for bug #1429756

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2015-03-09 08:47:12 Martin Pitt bug added bug
2015-03-09 08:47:20 Martin Pitt upstart (Ubuntu): importance Undecided High
2015-03-09 08:53:17 Martin Pitt summary test_job_process fails in majority of cases FTBFS: test_job_process fails in majority of cases
2015-03-09 08:53:22 Martin Pitt nominated for series Ubuntu Vivid
2015-03-09 08:53:22 Martin Pitt bug task added upstart (Ubuntu Vivid)
2015-03-09 08:55:51 Martin Pitt tags autopkgtset qa-daily-testing
2015-03-09 08:55:55 Martin Pitt tags autopkgtset qa-daily-testing autopkgtest qa-daily-testing
2015-03-09 11:15:01 Martin Pitt description As you see in the history in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-adt-upstart/?, upstart's test fail almost all the time, on ok 53 - with single line command writing fast and exiting not ok 54 - with single line command writing lots of data fast and exiting wrong value for bytes, expected 3145728 got 3018027 at tests/test_job_process.c:3886 (test_start). 1..153 FAIL: test_job_process Sometimes they succeed on one architecture, and with lots of luck on both, but this is way too flaky to be an useful test. This keeps blocking the propagation of other packages from -proposed. As you see in the history in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-adt-upstart/?, upstart's test fail almost all the time, on ok 53 - with single line command writing fast and exiting not ok 54 - with single line command writing lots of data fast and exiting  wrong value for bytes, expected 3145728 got 3018027  at tests/test_job_process.c:3886 (test_start). 1..153 FAIL: test_job_process Sometimes they succeed on one architecture, and with lots of luck on both, but this is way too flaky to be an useful test. This keeps blocking the propagation of other packages from -proposed. This was most likely triggered by the kernel update from 3.18 to 3.19.
2015-03-10 14:44:33 James Hunt upstart (Ubuntu Vivid): assignee James Hunt (jamesodhunt)
2015-03-12 15:17:27 Andy Whitcroft bug task added linux (Ubuntu)
2015-03-12 15:17:36 Andy Whitcroft linux (Ubuntu Vivid): importance Undecided High
2015-03-12 15:17:41 Andy Whitcroft linux (Ubuntu Vivid): status New Confirmed
2015-03-12 15:17:44 Andy Whitcroft linux (Ubuntu Vivid): assignee Andy Whitcroft (apw)
2015-03-12 15:17:47 Andy Whitcroft linux (Ubuntu Vivid): milestone ubuntu-15.03
2015-03-12 23:08:37 Andy Whitcroft linux (Ubuntu Vivid): status Confirmed In Progress
2015-03-12 23:15:50 Andy Whitcroft summary FTBFS: test_job_process fails in majority of cases FTBFS: upstart test_job_process fails in majority of cases
2015-03-12 23:16:25 Andy Whitcroft summary FTBFS: upstart test_job_process fails in majority of cases FTBFS: upstart test_job_process fails in majority of cases / Kernel returning unexpected EIO at near of file
2015-03-13 09:13:10 James Hunt attachment added bug-1429756.tgz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/1429756/+attachment/4343995/+files/bug-1429756.tgz
2015-03-13 10:26:47 James Hunt upstart (Ubuntu Vivid): status New Invalid
2015-03-13 10:28:53 James Hunt summary FTBFS: upstart test_job_process fails in majority of cases / Kernel returning unexpected EIO at near of file FTBFS: upstart test_job_process fails in majority of cases / Kernel returning unexpected EIO at end of file
2015-03-13 10:40:48 James Hunt bug added subscriber James Hunt
2015-05-18 14:19:50 Andy Whitcroft description As you see in the history in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-adt-upstart/?, upstart's test fail almost all the time, on ok 53 - with single line command writing fast and exiting not ok 54 - with single line command writing lots of data fast and exiting  wrong value for bytes, expected 3145728 got 3018027  at tests/test_job_process.c:3886 (test_start). 1..153 FAIL: test_job_process Sometimes they succeed on one architecture, and with lots of luck on both, but this is way too flaky to be an useful test. This keeps blocking the propagation of other packages from -proposed. This was most likely triggered by the kernel update from 3.18 to 3.19. As you see in the history in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-adt-upstart/?, upstart's test fail almost all the time, on ok 53 - with single line command writing fast and exiting not ok 54 - with single line command writing lots of data fast and exiting  wrong value for bytes, expected 3145728 got 3018027  at tests/test_job_process.c:3886 (test_start). 1..153 FAIL: test_job_process Sometimes they succeed on one architecture, and with lots of luck on both, but this is way too flaky to be an useful test. This keeps blocking the propagation of other packages from -proposed. This was most likely triggered by the kernel update from 3.18 to 3.19. === break-fix: 1a48632ffed61352a7810ce089dc5a8bcd505a60 1a48632ffed61352a7810ce089dc5a8bcd505a60
2015-05-18 14:19:58 Andy Whitcroft tags autopkgtest qa-daily-testing autopkgtest kernel-bug-break-fix qa-daily-testing
2015-05-18 14:45:48 Andy Whitcroft description As you see in the history in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-adt-upstart/?, upstart's test fail almost all the time, on ok 53 - with single line command writing fast and exiting not ok 54 - with single line command writing lots of data fast and exiting  wrong value for bytes, expected 3145728 got 3018027  at tests/test_job_process.c:3886 (test_start). 1..153 FAIL: test_job_process Sometimes they succeed on one architecture, and with lots of luck on both, but this is way too flaky to be an useful test. This keeps blocking the propagation of other packages from -proposed. This was most likely triggered by the kernel update from 3.18 to 3.19. === break-fix: 1a48632ffed61352a7810ce089dc5a8bcd505a60 1a48632ffed61352a7810ce089dc5a8bcd505a60 As you see in the history in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-adt-upstart/?, upstart's test fail almost all the time, on ok 53 - with single line command writing fast and exiting not ok 54 - with single line command writing lots of data fast and exiting  wrong value for bytes, expected 3145728 got 3018027  at tests/test_job_process.c:3886 (test_start). 1..153 FAIL: test_job_process Sometimes they succeed on one architecture, and with lots of luck on both, but this is way too flaky to be an useful test. This keeps blocking the propagation of other packages from -proposed. This was most likely triggered by the kernel update from 3.18 to 3.19. === break-fix: 52bce7f8d4fc633c9a9d0646eef58ba6ae9a3b73 1a48632ffed61352a7810ce089dc5a8bcd505a60
2015-05-18 15:39:37 Andy Whitcroft linux (Ubuntu Vivid): status In Progress Confirmed
2015-05-18 15:39:41 Andy Whitcroft linux (Ubuntu): status In Progress Confirmed
2015-07-07 03:24:28 Launchpad Janitor linux (Ubuntu): status Confirmed Fix Released
2015-07-09 15:15:54 Brad Figg tags autopkgtest kernel-bug-break-fix qa-daily-testing autopkgtest kernel-bug-break-fix qa-daily-testing verification-needed-vivid
2015-07-21 14:49:04 Brad Figg tags autopkgtest kernel-bug-break-fix qa-daily-testing verification-needed-vivid autopkgtest kernel-bug-break-fix qa-daily-testing verification-done-vivid
2015-07-22 15:38:53 Launchpad Janitor linux (Ubuntu Vivid): status Confirmed Fix Released
2015-07-23 15:22:22 Andy Whitcroft tags autopkgtest kernel-bug-break-fix qa-daily-testing verification-done-vivid autopkgtest qa-daily-testing verification-done-vivid