I was attempting to DL 3 nvidia drivers consecutivly, and realised I did not need the older one so I cancled it and this is what caused the crash. a box opened earlyer telling me about un autherised drivers but vanish befor I counl click on it

Bug #636766 reported by sixto Rodriguez Jr
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
upower (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: upower

10.10 beta
running off of the cd, a box flashed informing me I needed au authorised driver or something. when I finish reading it it vanished.
I went to applications, software Center and typed Nvidia. I selected Transitional package for nvidia-gix-185, 173 and 96-dev.
while gix-185 started to DL I attempted to cansel 96 and thats when it crashed.

I was expecting to remove the 173 and 96-dev, but instead it crashed.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: upower 0.9.5-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-19.28-generic 2.6.35.3
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-19-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Sep 13 01:43:08 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/upower/upowerd
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Beta i386 (20100901.1)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/upower/upowerd
ProcEnviron:

SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x1dbed8 <dbus_connection_send+40>: mov 0x4(%esi),%eax
 PC (0x001dbed8) ok
 source "0x4(%esi)" (0x00000014) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%eax" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: upower
StacktraceTop:
 dbus_connection_send () from /lib/libdbus-1.so.3
 dbus_g_method_return () from /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2
 ?? ()
 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER ()
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2
Title: upowerd crashed with SIGSEGV in dbus_connection_send()
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #623785, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.