Comment 439 for bug 332945

Lionel Dricot (ploum) wrote :

Graeme > the number of duplicates speaks for itself. But it seems that, for some reason, no usability is involved in this bug (the current behaviour is against nearly *every* usability rule ). I assume (and I hope) that this "more-important-than-usability" reason worth it and I would like more communication from the people responsible of this behaviour.