Comment 126 for bug 332945

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 14:21 +0000, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> It's not particularly productive to be covering, in bug report comments,
> exactly the same points as were covered in the mailing list discussion
> six weeks earlier. So if you could read the mailing list discussion
> first, that would be awesome. :-)

Thank you for your kind words. I did read the discussion - the entire
interminable discussion :-> - and was left with the impression, perhaps
mistaken, that the design approach that led to the original bug report
was in fact still the intended approach.

If this is incorrect - if the approach has changed in response to
community feedback - then my apologies, I misread some of the later
posts. If, on the other hand, the design approach remains the same
despite counter-arguments both reasoned and inflamed, then I offer my
$0.02 as to why this approach is terribly, terribly wrong.

Hoping that the designers have heard the community, sincerely,