[lucid] icedtea-gcjwebplugin is removed on upgrade, should do something graceful to keep plugin working

Bug #561040 reported by bcrowell
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: update-manager

Before upgrading from Karmic to Lucid beta 2, I had the icedtea6-plugin package installed and selected, and java applets were working in firefox. After upgrading, icedtea6-plugin was deselected, and no java plugin showed up in firefox when I entered about:plugins in the URL bar. To make java applets work again, I had to do an apt-get install icedtea6-plugin to reselect the package. The package was still cached on my system; it just needed to be reselected manually.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: update-manager 1:0.134
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Apr 11 15:19:54 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: update-manager

Revision history for this message
bcrowell (launchpadcrowell07) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Michael Vogt (mvo) wrote :

Thanks for your bugreport.

Can you please attach the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade/* ?

Changed in update-manager (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
bcrowell (launchpadcrowell07) wrote :

Thanks, Michael Vogt , for your reply. Here is a tarball of those files.

Revision history for this message
Michael Vogt (mvo) wrote :

Thanks for the logs. The reason it got removed is that it got removed from 10.04:

$ rmadison icedtea-gcjwebplugin
icedtea-gcjwebplugin | 1.0-0ubuntu5 | hardy/universe | source, amd64, i386
icedtea-gcjwebplugin | 1.0-0ubuntu8 | hardy-updates/universe | source, amd64, i386
icedtea-gcjwebplugin | 1.0-1ubuntu4 | intrepid/universe | source, amd64, i386
icedtea-gcjwebplugin | 1.0-1ubuntu4 | jaunty/universe | source, amd64, i386
icedtea-gcjwebplugin | 1.0-1ubuntu4 | karmic/universe | source, amd64, i386

It looks like it was replaced iwth icedtea-plugin without provided a upgrade path.

affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) → openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Changed in openjdk-6 (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Michael Vogt (mvo) wrote :

The only plugin that got removed is icedtea-gcjwebpluin. the icedtea6-plugin is upgraded according to your logs. So this is either a firefox or a icedtea6-plugin bug. And please ignore comment #4, I misread that the plugin was gone entirely, when it was just not available.

Revision history for this message
bcrowell (launchpadcrowell07) wrote :

Thanks, Michael Vogt, for looking into this. I'm going to change the bug so that it's listed as a bug in icedtea6-plugin.

summary: - [lucid] icedtea6-plugin becomes deselected on upgrade
+ [lucid] icedtea-gcjwebplugin is removed on upgrade, should do something
+ graceful to keep plugin working
Revision history for this message
bcrowell (launchpadcrowell07) wrote :

Is not actually a bug in openjdk-6. The problem only relates to the *-plugin packages that provide java applet support for web browsers. Not filing a bug against icedtea-gcjwebplugin, because icedtea-gcjwebplugin appears to be defunct, so presumably nobody is watching and fixing bugs on that package.

Revision history for this message
bcrowell (launchpadcrowell07) wrote :

Okay, that didn't work. Comment #7 is my explanation of my attempt to switch this to being filed as a bug against icedtea6-plugin. However, after I did that, the web interface came up with this message:

'icedtea6-plugin' is a binary package. This bug has been assigned to its source package 'openjdk-6' instead.

I'm not sure at this point how to bring this bug to the attention of people who are actually handling bug reports for the plugin aspects of java...?

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

well, we would have to re-introduce this as an empty package i lucid, but as this is the very old gcjwebplugin I doubt it is worth it.
proposing to close this report as won't fix

Changed in openjdk-6 (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
Revision history for this message
dino99 (9d9) wrote :

Closing that outdated report as EOL has been reached long time ago

Changed in openjdk-6 (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.