update-manager crashed with CacheExceptionDpkgInterrupted in __init__()

Bug #519865 reported by tad1073
20
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
update-manager (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: update-manager

I did some updates this morning and had a failed package:

:~/Desktop$ sudo dpkg --configure -a
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.92bubuntu64) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)

Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-12-generic
cpio: ./lib/udev/firmware.sh: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-12-generic
dpkg: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Feb 10 09:42:33 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/update-manager
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha amd64 (20100113)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: update-manager 1:0.131.4
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined (enforce)
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python2.6 /usr/bin/update-manager --dist-upgrade
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-12.17-generic
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/update-manager', '--dist-upgrade']
SourcePackage: update-manager
Title: update-manager crashed with CacheExceptionDpkgInterrupted in __init__()
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-12-generic x86_64
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
tad1073 (tad1073) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #519882, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
visibility: private → public
tad1073 (tad1073)
security vulnerability: no → yes
security vulnerability: yes → no
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.