Option for only wifi + cellular is not really needed for user to chose from. It is still used by the device, when application does not require precise location, in order to preserve battery, but this is not to be controlled by user. In my option no need to have any option like this here. Still your statement is wrong, you are not referring to accuracy in your examples but to actual availability, yes when you cannot get GPS lock, then your wifi will get "better" location, in comparison to no location at all. Yes wifi is more "accurate" while GPS is acquiring lock. But this is not accuracy, but speed. It is like saying motorbike is faster than car, because it can accelerate faster from still, even though car can actually develop greater top speed. But do you have case, where GPS is accessible and your option GPS+wifi is more accurate in comparison? to back up "less accurate" statement? So adjusting my example with data connections to your logic: - 4G only (slower) - 2G/3G/4G This is obviously wrong, yet by your logic, it is correct. Combined 4G/3G/2G will never be faster than option 4G only, yet there will be cases without 4G coverage when it will be "faster" compare to no 4G signal. By your logic 4G is then slower. On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas