Ubuntu
unattended-upgrades package

  1. Bug #1702793
  2. Activity log

Activity log for bug #1702793

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2017-07-06 23:58:35 Matt Bearup bug added bug
2017-07-07 00:03:20 Matt Bearup description Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial package (0.90) - requesting that they be added. Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be merged into both packages.
2017-07-07 00:03:51 Matt Bearup description Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be merged into both packages. Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2017-07-12 21:00:17 Joshua R. Poulson bug added subscriber Joshua R. Poulson
2017-07-12 21:00:20 Launchpad Janitor unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2017-09-19 15:52:40 Brian Murray summary Merge changes from upstream SRU changes from upstream
2017-09-19 15:52:46 Brian Murray unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu): importance Undecided Wishlist
2018-05-24 13:58:25 Balint Reczey description Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs and the following tests are passing: - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-05-24 14:00:02 Balint Reczey summary SRU changes from upstream Full backport SRU for unattended-upgrades
2018-05-24 14:14:24 Eric Desrochers bug added subscriber Eric Desrochers
2018-05-31 13:03:55 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs and the following tests are passing: - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified:  - TODO add most important bugs and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. * LP: #1773033 is a regression causing u-u to not install upgrades on shutdown when the system was started on battery. I have a WIP fix and can add the fix to the SRU if needed. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-05-31 20:20:53 Eric Desrochers tags sts
2018-07-09 15:21:17 Eric Desrochers tags sts sts ua
2018-07-19 16:12:07 Balint Reczey unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu): status Confirmed In Progress
2018-07-30 13:42:29 Eric Desrochers description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified:  - TODO add most important bugs and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. * LP: #1773033 is a regression causing u-u to not install upgrades on shutdown when the system was started on battery. I have a WIP fix and can add the fix to the SRU if needed. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified:   - TODO add most important bugs + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. * LP: #1773033 is a regression causing u-u to not install upgrades on shutdown when the system was started on battery. I have a WIP fix and can add the fix to the SRU if needed. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-11-02 18:32:14 Guillaume Penin bug added subscriber Guillaume Penin
2018-11-27 16:28:57 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified:   - TODO add most important bugs + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. * LP: #1773033 is a regression causing u-u to not install upgrades on shutdown when the system was started on battery. I have a WIP fix and can add the fix to the SRU if needed. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome: + LP: #1230246 + LP: #1260041 + LP: #1269177 + LP: #1357093 + LP: #1396787 + LP: #1446552 + LP: #1455097 + LP: #1458204 + LP: #1544942 + LP: #1577215 + LP: #1602536 + LP: #1615381 + LP: #1624644 + LP: #1632361 + LP: #1649709 + LP: #1654070 + LP: #1654600 + LP: #1675079 + LP: #1680599 + LP: #1686470 + LP: #1687129 + LP: #1690980 + LP: #1698159 + LP: #1702793 + LP: #1714019 + LP: #1718419 + LP: #1719630 + LP: #1722426 + LP: #1737441 + LP: #1737442 + LP: #1737635 + LP: #1737637 + LP: #1737717 + LP: #1741579 + LP: #1764797 + LP: #1773033 + LP: #1775292 + LP: #1775307 + LP: #1778219 + LP: #1778800 + LP: #1779157 + LP: #1781176 + LP: #1781183 + LP: #1781446 + LP: #1781586 + LP: #1785093 + LP: #1789637 + LP: #1803749 [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. * LP: #1773033 is a regression causing u-u to not install upgrades on shutdown when the system was started on battery. I have a WIP fix and can add the fix to the SRU if needed. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-11-29 14:22:44 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome: + LP: #1230246 + LP: #1260041 + LP: #1269177 + LP: #1357093 + LP: #1396787 + LP: #1446552 + LP: #1455097 + LP: #1458204 + LP: #1544942 + LP: #1577215 + LP: #1602536 + LP: #1615381 + LP: #1624644 + LP: #1632361 + LP: #1649709 + LP: #1654070 + LP: #1654600 + LP: #1675079 + LP: #1680599 + LP: #1686470 + LP: #1687129 + LP: #1690980 + LP: #1698159 + LP: #1702793 + LP: #1714019 + LP: #1718419 + LP: #1719630 + LP: #1722426 + LP: #1737441 + LP: #1737442 + LP: #1737635 + LP: #1737637 + LP: #1737717 + LP: #1741579 + LP: #1764797 + LP: #1773033 + LP: #1775292 + LP: #1775307 + LP: #1778219 + LP: #1778800 + LP: #1779157 + LP: #1781176 + LP: #1781183 + LP: #1781446 + LP: #1781586 + LP: #1785093 + LP: #1789637 + LP: #1803749 [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. * LP: #1773033 is a regression causing u-u to not install upgrades on shutdown when the system was started on battery. I have a WIP fix and can add the fix to the SRU if needed. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 SRU template ok    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441    + LP: #1737442 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1737635    + LP: #1737637    + LP: #1737717    + LP: #1741579    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. * LP: #1773033 is a regression causing u-u to not install upgrades on shutdown when the system was started on battery. I have a WIP fix and can add the fix to the SRU if needed. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-11-29 15:54:14 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 SRU template ok    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441    + LP: #1737442 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1737635    + LP: #1737637    + LP: #1737717    + LP: #1741579    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. * LP: #1773033 is a regression causing u-u to not install upgrades on shutdown when the system was started on battery. I have a WIP fix and can add the fix to the SRU if needed. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 SRU template ok    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441    + LP: #1737442 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1737635    + LP: #1737637    + LP: #1737717    + LP: #1741579    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-11-29 17:45:26 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 SRU template ok    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441    + LP: #1737442 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1737635    + LP: #1737637    + LP: #1737717    + LP: #1741579    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441    + LP: #1737442 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1737635    + LP: #1737637    + LP: #1737717    + LP: #1741579    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-11-30 19:22:17 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441    + LP: #1737442 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1737635    + LP: #1737637    + LP: #1737717    + LP: #1741579    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441    + LP: #1737442 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1737635    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-11-30 21:01:34 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441    + LP: #1737442 to add u-u test case    + LP: #1737635    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-11-30 21:29:52 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-11-30 21:34:20 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-11-30 22:31:59 Brian Murray description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552    + LP: #1455097    + LP: #1458204    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely. * There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1455097 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-12-03 15:01:31 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1455097 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok    + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-12-03 15:47:12 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok    + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361 really needs SRU template    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093 dup of LP: #1675079    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok    + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361 the bug is referenced mistakenly while u-u had a related fix which has no meaningful impact on users    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-12-03 15:49:51 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport I suggest that this bug should be considered verified when the following list of bugs are verified: - TODO add most important bugs    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel and the following tests are passing:  - TODO add tests not covered by bugs above All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093 dup of LP: #1675079    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok    + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361 the bug is referenced mistakenly while u-u had a related fix which has no meaningful impact on users    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport this is an overview of all LP bugs the upload fixes: - most important bugs (feel free to add more)    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093 dup of LP: #1675079    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok    + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361 the bug is referenced mistakenly while u-u had a related fix which has no meaningful impact on users    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-12-03 18:09:56 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport this is an overview of all LP bugs the upload fixes: - most important bugs (feel free to add more)    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1269177 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.9    + LP: #1357093 dup of LP: #1675079    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok    + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1544942 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.8    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1632361 the bug is referenced mistakenly while u-u had a related fix which has no meaningful impact on users    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1687129 already fixed in 0.90ubuntu0.6    + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport this is an overview of all LP bugs the upload fixes: - most important bugs (feel free to add more)    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok    + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-12-03 18:11:08 Balint Reczey description [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport this is an overview of all LP bugs the upload fixes: - most important bugs (feel free to add more)    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok    + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737441 fix not tracked for u-u in xenial, just for python-apt    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream. [Impact] * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades 1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the inter-dependencies between them. [Test Case] * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself covers the full backport this is an overview of all LP bugs the upload fixes: - most important bugs (feel free to add more)    + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:    + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok    + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok    + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok    + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok    + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok    + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok    + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial    + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok    + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok    + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward    + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok    + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok    + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok    + LP: #1702793 this bug    + LP: #1714019 just a merge request    + LP: #1718419 just a merge request    + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok    + LP: #1722426 just a merge request    + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok    + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok    + LP: #1764797 just a merge request    + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok    + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok    + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok    + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok    + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok    + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok    + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok    + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok [Regression Potential] * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install, upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations can be cherry-picked later. [Other Info] I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs. [Original Bug Text] Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be pulled from upstream.
2018-12-03 19:17:08 Brian Murray unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial): status New Fix Committed
2018-12-03 19:17:09 Brian Murray bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2018-12-03 19:17:12 Brian Murray bug added subscriber SRU Verification
2018-12-03 19:17:15 Brian Murray tags sts ua sts ua verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
2018-12-05 03:39:11 Mathew Hodson unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial): importance Undecided Wishlist
2018-12-28 20:58:05 Mathew Hodson bug added subscriber Mathew Hodson
2019-02-05 19:46:56 Barry Kolts tags sts ua verification-needed verification-needed-xenial sts ua verification-done-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
2019-02-05 19:48:45 Barry Kolts bug added subscriber Barry Kolts
2019-02-09 07:04:50 Mathew Hodson unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu): importance Wishlist Low
2019-02-09 07:04:53 Mathew Hodson unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial): importance Wishlist Low
2019-02-09 07:05:16 Mathew Hodson tags sts ua verification-done-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-xenial sts ua upgrade-software-version verification-done verification-done-xenial
2019-02-09 07:08:42 Mathew Hodson unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu): status In Progress Fix Released
2019-02-28 12:58:53 Łukasz Zemczak tags sts ua upgrade-software-version verification-done verification-done-xenial sts ua upgrade-software-version verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
2019-04-09 16:49:29 Balint Reczey tags sts ua upgrade-software-version verification-needed verification-needed-xenial sts ua upgrade-software-version verification-done verification-done-xenial
2019-04-25 10:50:00 Launchpad Janitor unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2019-04-26 04:17:55 Mathew Hodson removed subscriber Mathew Hodson