nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() [ubuntuone_nautilus_observed_file_unref]

Bug #681472 reported by Matt Zimmerman
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client

This is an intentional duplicate of bug 680968. I'm filing it a third time because this time seb128 has REALLY fixed the apport retracer so that it should get a complete backtrace. :-)

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: ubuntuone-client-gnome 1.4.5-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.40-generic 2.6.35.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Nov 24 14:39:34 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
ProcCmdline: nautilus
ProcCwd: /home/mdz
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/zsh
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f18bd8a6ec0 <g_str_hash>: movsbl (%rdi),%eax
 PC (0x7f18bd8a6ec0) ok
 source "(%rdi)" (0x00000000) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%eax" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: ubuntuone-client
StacktraceTop:
 g_str_hash () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_hash_table_lookup () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-2.0/libnautilus-ubuntuone.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_datalist_id_set_data_full () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fuse kvm libvirtd lpadmin plugdev sambashare video

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #648082, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.