ubuntuone-client-applet crashed with AttributeError in from_token_and_callback()

Bug #470436 reported by borkenz_snie on 2009-11-02
20
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu)
High
John Lenton

Bug Description

Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client

i don't know what happened

ProblemType: Crash
.home.lukasj..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.exceptions.log:

.home.lukasj..config.ubuntuone.ubuntuone.client.conf:
 [ubuntuone]
 bookmarked = True
 connected = True
 connect = 0
 show_applet = 1
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Nov 2 11:06:59 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/ubuntuone-client-applet
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
Package: ubuntuone-client-gnome 1.0.2-0ubuntu2
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/ubuntuone-client-applet
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/ubuntuone-client-applet']
SourcePackage: ubuntuone-client
Title: ubuntuone-client-applet crashed with AttributeError in from_token_and_callback()
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare
XsessionErrors:
 (gnome-settings-daemon:2011): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed
 (gnome-settings-daemon:2011): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed
 (nautilus:2093): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2127): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (gnome-panel:2092): Gdk-WARNING **: /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.3/gdk/x11/gdkdrawable-x11.c:952 drawable is not a pixmap or window

borkenz_snie (lukasj) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #469184, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
visibility: private → public
Eric Casteleijn (thisfred) wrote :
Download full text (6.1 KiB)

Not a duplicate, this bug is not a 503 Service Unknown, but rather:

DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
Ubuntu-One Client Version 1.0.2 wird gestartet
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
DBus-Fehler: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply tim...

Read more...

Changed in ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu):
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → High
assignee: nobody → John Lenton (chipaca)
Changed in ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Fix Committed
assignee: John Lenton (chipaca) → nobody
assignee: nobody → Bongcaivang (bongcaivang)
Roman Yepishev (rye) on 2010-02-20
Changed in ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Triaged
assignee: Bongcaivang (bongcaivang) → John Lenton (chipaca)
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers