| 2014-07-22 06:39:21 |
Anthony Wong |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2014-07-22 06:40:51 |
Anthony Wong |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber David Planella |
| 2014-07-22 07:06:38 |
Anthony Wong |
description |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact). Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users. Advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font, the downside is it may be of lower quality than DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
Another option is DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, which is in the fonts-droid package. The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide. On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number. The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact). Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users. Advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font, the downside is it may be of lower quality than DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
Another option is DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, which is in the fonts-droid package. The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide. On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number. The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
Just a few days ago, Google released the Noto Sans CJK fonts. The advantage of Noto is it takes care of different writing standard of Traditional and Simplified Chinese. As a result the total file size is much bigger. I haven't tried it on Ubuntu Touch so not sure how well it renders. It's not yet available in fonts-noto [3].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A
[2] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIBCsqwrSxowmLQS7kJm9gM58-FmOIYlZWoRlgqtqE4/edit#slide=id.g36327fada_643
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
|
| 2014-07-22 08:21:28 |
Rex Tsai |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Rex Tsai |
| 2014-07-22 08:21:52 |
Rex Tsai |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Shuduo Sang |
| 2014-07-22 08:58:59 |
Launchpad Janitor |
ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2014-07-22 09:03:07 |
David Planella |
description |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact). Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users. Advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font, the downside is it may be of lower quality than DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
Another option is DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, which is in the fonts-droid package. The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide. On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number. The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
Just a few days ago, Google released the Noto Sans CJK fonts. The advantage of Noto is it takes care of different writing standard of Traditional and Simplified Chinese. As a result the total file size is much bigger. I haven't tried it on Ubuntu Touch so not sure how well it renders. It's not yet available in fonts-noto [3].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A
[2] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIBCsqwrSxowmLQS7kJm9gM58-FmOIYlZWoRlgqtqE4/edit#slide=id.g36327fada_643
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
wqy-microhei (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, modified):
- Pros:
- The advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font. The downside is it may be of lower quality than the original DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
- Cons:
- I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact).
- Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users.
- Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
fonts-droid (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, original):
- Pros:
- The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide.
-Cons:
- On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number.
- The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
As an additional alternative, just a few days ago, Google released the Noto Sans CJK fonts [2][3]:
fonts-noto (Noto Sans CJK fonts):
- Pros:
- It takes care of different writing standard of Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- It covers Korean as well
- Cons:
- Needs to be tested
- Bigger size than the other alternatives as a result of catering for both Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- Not yet packaged [3]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A
[2] http://googledevelopers.blogspot.de/2014/07/noto-cjk-font-that-is-complete.html
[3] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIBCsqwrSxowmLQS7kJm9gM58-FmOIYlZWoRlgqtqE4/edit#slide=id.g36327fada_643
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
|
| 2014-07-22 09:12:44 |
Anthony Wong |
description |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
wqy-microhei (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, modified):
- Pros:
- The advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font. The downside is it may be of lower quality than the original DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
- Cons:
- I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact).
- Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users.
- Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
fonts-droid (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, original):
- Pros:
- The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide.
-Cons:
- On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number.
- The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
As an additional alternative, just a few days ago, Google released the Noto Sans CJK fonts [2][3]:
fonts-noto (Noto Sans CJK fonts):
- Pros:
- It takes care of different writing standard of Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- It covers Korean as well
- Cons:
- Needs to be tested
- Bigger size than the other alternatives as a result of catering for both Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- Not yet packaged [3]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A
[2] http://googledevelopers.blogspot.de/2014/07/noto-cjk-font-that-is-complete.html
[3] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIBCsqwrSxowmLQS7kJm9gM58-FmOIYlZWoRlgqtqE4/edit#slide=id.g36327fada_643
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
wqy-microhei (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, modified):
- Pros:
- The advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font. The downside is it may be of lower quality than the original DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
- Cons:
- I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact).
- Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users.
- Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
fonts-droid (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, original):
- Pros:
- The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide.
-Cons:
- On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number.
- The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
As an additional alternative, just a few days ago, Google released the Noto Sans CJK fonts [2][3]:
fonts-noto (Noto Sans CJK fonts):
- Pros:
- It takes care of different writing standard of Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- It covers Japanese and Korean as well
- Cons:
- Needs to be tested
- Bigger size than the other alternatives as a result of catering for both Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- Not yet packaged [3]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A
[2] http://googledevelopers.blogspot.de/2014/07/noto-cjk-font-that-is-complete.html
[3] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIBCsqwrSxowmLQS7kJm9gM58-FmOIYlZWoRlgqtqE4/edit#slide=id.g36327fada_643
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
|
| 2014-07-22 11:44:11 |
David Planella |
description |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
wqy-microhei (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, modified):
- Pros:
- The advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font. The downside is it may be of lower quality than the original DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
- Cons:
- I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact).
- Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users.
- Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
fonts-droid (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, original):
- Pros:
- The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide.
-Cons:
- On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number.
- The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
As an additional alternative, just a few days ago, Google released the Noto Sans CJK fonts [2][3]:
fonts-noto (Noto Sans CJK fonts):
- Pros:
- It takes care of different writing standard of Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- It covers Japanese and Korean as well
- Cons:
- Needs to be tested
- Bigger size than the other alternatives as a result of catering for both Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- Not yet packaged [3]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A
[2] http://googledevelopers.blogspot.de/2014/07/noto-cjk-font-that-is-complete.html
[3] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIBCsqwrSxowmLQS7kJm9gM58-FmOIYlZWoRlgqtqE4/edit#slide=id.g36327fada_643
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
wqy-microhei (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, modified):
- Pros:
- The advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font. The downside is it may be of lower quality than the original DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
- Cons:
- I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact).
- Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users.
- Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
fonts-droid (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, original):
- Pros:
- The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide.
-Cons:
- On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number.
- The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
As an additional alternative, just a few days ago, Google released the Noto Sans CJK fonts [2][3]:
fonts-noto (Noto Sans CJK fonts):
- Pros:
- It takes care of different writing standard of Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- It covers Japanese and Korean as well
- Cons:
- Needs to be tested
- Bigger size than the other alternatives as a result of catering for both Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- Not yet packaged [4]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A
[2] http://googledevelopers.blogspot.de/2014/07/noto-cjk-font-that-is-complete.html
[3] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIBCsqwrSxowmLQS7kJm9gM58-FmOIYlZWoRlgqtqE4/edit#slide=id.g36327fada_643
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
|
| 2014-07-25 15:14:39 |
Rex Tsai |
attachment added |
|
20140725230319.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1346766/+attachment/4162814/+files/20140725230319.png |
|
| 2014-07-26 15:47:03 |
Cheng-Chia Tseng |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Gunnar Hjalmarsson |
| 2014-07-26 15:52:10 |
Cheng-Chia Tseng |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Cheng-Chia Tseng |
| 2014-07-26 17:54:10 |
Gunnar Hjalmarsson |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Aron Xu |
| 2014-07-26 17:55:27 |
Gunnar Hjalmarsson |
bug watch added |
|
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
|
| 2014-07-26 17:55:27 |
Gunnar Hjalmarsson |
affects |
ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) |
ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu) |
|
| 2014-07-27 09:08:41 |
Anthony Wong |
description |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
wqy-microhei (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, modified):
- Pros:
- The advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font. The downside is it may be of lower quality than the original DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
- Cons:
- I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact).
- Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users.
- Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
fonts-droid (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, original):
- Pros:
- The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide.
-Cons:
- On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number.
- The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
As an additional alternative, just a few days ago, Google released the Noto Sans CJK fonts [2][3]:
fonts-noto (Noto Sans CJK fonts):
- Pros:
- It takes care of different writing standard of Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- It covers Japanese and Korean as well
- Cons:
- Needs to be tested
- Bigger size than the other alternatives as a result of catering for both Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- Not yet packaged [4]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A
[2] http://googledevelopers.blogspot.de/2014/07/noto-cjk-font-that-is-complete.html
[3] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIBCsqwrSxowmLQS7kJm9gM58-FmOIYlZWoRlgqtqE4/edit#slide=id.g36327fada_643
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
Ubuntu Touch uses Kaiti style font as the main UI font for displaying Chinese, which is not optimal as nowadays operating systems all use Heiti style font for the UI, we should really change it asap.
Currently there are two choices on Ubuntu, fonts-droid and wqy-microhei. Below I will list out the pros and cons.
wqy-microhei (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, modified):
- Pros:
- The advantage of wqy-microhei being its wider codepoint coverage, for example it also contains Japanese Kanas and Korean Hanguls in one font. The downside is it may be of lower quality than the original DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf due to its lack of maintenance in recent years.
- Cons:
- I am not too much in favour of using wqy-microhei, the reason being that it is basically a font that based on the Droid font (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf to be exact).
- Upstream has not updated wqy-microhei for long time, so it lacks any new updates from the Droid font, although it may not be obvious to users.
- Another possible disadvantage of wqy-microhei is it includes more latin characters, which may result to inconsistent glyphs being used.
fonts-droid (DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf, original):
- Pros:
- The advantage is it has coverage of CJK ext. A [1], which wqy-microhei does not provide.
-Cons:
- On the other hand, wqy-microhei has added some glyphs that the droid font does not provide, I don't have the exact number of that but I believe it's just a small number.
- The disadvantage is it does not include Korean Hangul, which can be remedied with another Korean font, and it's not our current concern anyway.
As an additional alternative, just a few days ago, Google released the Noto Sans CJK fonts [2][3]:
fonts-noto (Noto Sans CJK fonts):
- Pros:
- It takes care of different writing standards of Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese, Japanese and Korean, which makes everyone happy (see slide 13-14 of [3])
- It covers Japanese and Korean as well
- Cons:
- Needs to be tested
- Bigger size than the other alternatives as a result of catering for both Traditional and Simplified Chinese
- Not yet packaged [4]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Unified_Ideographs_Extension_A
[2] http://googledevelopers.blogspot.de/2014/07/noto-cjk-font-that-is-complete.html
[3] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIBCsqwrSxowmLQS7kJm9gM58-FmOIYlZWoRlgqtqE4/edit#slide=id.g36327fada_643
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754926 |
|
| 2014-07-28 09:58:20 |
Rex Tsai |
attachment added |
|
fonts-droid-only.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-touch-meta/+bug/1346766/+attachment/4164217/+files/fonts-droid-only.png |
|
| 2014-07-28 14:20:43 |
Gunnar Hjalmarsson |
attachment added |
|
65-droid-sans-touch.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-touch-meta/+bug/1346766/+attachment/4164352/+files/65-droid-sans-touch.conf |
|
| 2014-07-28 16:47:25 |
Rex Tsai |
bug watch added |
|
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736680 |
|
| 2014-07-28 16:47:25 |
Rex Tsai |
bug watch added |
|
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736681 |
|
| 2014-07-29 07:39:30 |
David Planella |
tags |
|
rtm14 |
|
| 2014-07-29 07:39:44 |
David Planella |
ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu): importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
| 2014-07-29 07:39:46 |
David Planella |
ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu): status |
Confirmed |
Triaged |
|
| 2014-07-29 15:51:07 |
Rex Tsai |
attachment added |
|
fonts-wqy-only.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-touch-meta/+bug/1346766/+attachment/4165235/+files/fonts-wqy-only.png |
|
| 2014-07-29 17:21:30 |
Launchpad Janitor |
branch linked |
|
lp:~gunnarhj/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-touch.utopic_lp1346766 |
|
| 2014-07-29 17:21:53 |
Gunnar Hjalmarsson |
ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu): status |
Triaged |
In Progress |
|
| 2014-07-29 17:21:53 |
Gunnar Hjalmarsson |
ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu): assignee |
|
Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) |
|
| 2014-08-01 08:13:38 |
Launchpad Janitor |
branch linked |
|
lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-touch.utopic |
|
| 2014-08-01 08:14:06 |
Martin Pitt |
ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu): status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2014-08-01 08:27:38 |
Launchpad Janitor |
branch linked |
|
lp:ubuntu/utopic-proposed/ubuntu-touch-meta |
|
| 2014-08-01 09:41:46 |
Launchpad Janitor |
ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2014-08-04 08:50:26 |
Nobuto Murata |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Nobuto MURATA |
| 2014-08-04 09:01:45 |
Mitsuya Shibata |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Mitsuya Shibata |
