Completed update reaches "200%" progress and doesn't disappear

[Sebastien Bacher]

 Using rtm 249, updating the calendar application fails, the UI is not very useful in communicating the error though, see screenshot

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

u-s-s log info

"2015-03-06 10:17:55,390 - WARNING - START: com.ubuntu.calendar
2015-03-06 10:17:59,295 - WARNING - onStarted: com.ubuntu.calendar true
2015-03-06 10:17:59,738 - WARNING - onProcessing: com.ubuntu.calendar /home/phablet/.local/share/ubuntu-download-manager/Downloads/com.ubuntu.calendar_0.4.600_all.click
2015-03-06 10:18:01,607 - WARNING - onResumed: com.ubuntu.calendar true
2015-03-06 10:18:01,862 - WARNING - onProcessing: com.ubuntu.calendar /home/phablet/.local/share/ubuntu-download-manager/Downloads/com (1).ubuntu.calendar_0.4.600_all.click
2015-03-06 10:18:02,021 - WARNING - START: com.ubuntu.docviewer
2015-03-06 10:18:02,608 - WARNING - onErrorFound: com.ubuntu.calendar ProcessError: 0 - ErrorInProcess
Exit code: 7
Stdout:
Stderr:
2015-03-06 10:18:03,223 - WARNING - onStarted: com.ubuntu.docviewer true
2015-03-06 10:18:03,559 - WARNING - onProcessing: com.ubuntu.docviewer /home/phablet/.local/share/ubuntu-download-manager/Downloads/com.ubuntu.docviewer_0.3.92_armhf.click
2015-03-06 10:18:42,806 - WARNING - qrc:/qml/UncategorizedItemsView.qml:39: TypeError: Cannot read property of null"

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

not sure if that's not an issue with the service, I clicked retry a bunch of time and it gave no feedback

there are at least some issues with the UI
- retry button seems unactive
- no error displayed in the UI
- 200% ?!

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

oh, it seems it installed after all, I exited the panel and came back to find a "software uptodate" ... issue is that the apps view in unity8 didn't get refreshed (what component is supposed to force a refresh?) and clicking on the icon fails because (according to the log) it tries to start the old version

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

reported bug #1429033 about the fallover on unity8

[Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt)]

One possibility: the "200%" is because the code adds together 100% download progress + 100% installation progress, not taking into account that they are happening together.