SRU 1.0 tracking bug

Bug #1672755 reported by Barry Warsaw
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubuntu-image (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
High
Barry Warsaw
Xenial
Fix Released
High
Barry Warsaw
Yakkety
Fix Released
High
Barry Warsaw

Bug Description

New SRU tracking bug (with exception) for ubuntu-image 1.0 in Yakkety and Xenial.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates

[Impact]

ubuntu-image 1.0 fixes some bugs and pays down some technical debt. It represents the final gold release for the Zesty cycle, SRU'd back into X and Y. This release fixes some bogus warnings on the size of the mbr partition, it reverts an archive-wide global breakage for flake8, and it adds a new command line option --image-file-list. The snap version is now classic confinement.

[Test Case]

Create an image using the official amd64 model assertion. Ensure that the resulting image boots to 'press enter to configure' phase.

[Regression Potential]

* ubuntu-image may not produce a bootable image

Barry Warsaw (barry)
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Barry Warsaw (barry)
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Xenial):
assignee: nobody → Barry Warsaw (barry)
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Yakkety):
assignee: nobody → Barry Warsaw (barry)
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → High
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Xenial):
importance: Undecided → High
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Yakkety):
importance: Undecided → High
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu):
status: New → In Progress
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → In Progress
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Yakkety):
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Barry, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-image into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-image/1.0+16.04ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed
Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Yakkety):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Barry, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-image into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-image/1.0+16.10ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Barry Warsaw (barry)
tags: added: verification-done-xenial verification-done-yakkety
removed: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

Please add some details regarding the steps you took to verify this per Robie's to ubuntu-devel regarding "SRU quality and preventing regressions".

tags: added: verification-needed xenial
removed: verification-done-xenial verification-done-yakkety
Revision history for this message
Barry Warsaw (barry) wrote :

The manual tests are described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates

With u-i 1.0 we have an autopkgtest test that performs an amd64 boot test. This is essentially equivalent (and therefore redundant) with the manual boot tests for SRU. Still, it's important to continue to manually boot test the SRUs to ensure that the autopkgtests themselves aren't buggy in some way.

Therefor the manual tests are:

* ubuntu-image -d pc-amd64.assertion
* qemu-system-x86_64 pc.img

Then run through the configuration steps on the running image and try to ssh to the image.

tags: added: verification-done-xenial verification-done-yakkety
removed: verification-needed xenial
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-image - 1.0+16.10ubuntu1

---------------
ubuntu-image (1.0+16.10ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium

  * SRU tracking number LP: #1672755
  * Exit with a console message instead of crashing when the contents of a
    partition does not fit within the specified size. (LP:1666580)
  * Don't install an unusable global flake8 extension. (LP:1631156)
  * Fix the autopkgtests to use --output-dir instead of the obsolete
    --output command line switch. (LP:1667140)
  * Added ``--image-file-list`` command line argument to record the paths
    of all the disk image files written.
  * Added an autopkgtest to prove that generated images can be
    successfully booted (on amd64 only). (LP:1625732)
  * Add an autopkgtest for ensuring each PR has a changelog entry and a bug
    linked to it. (LP:1655671)
  * Make ubuntu-image a classic confinement snap. (LP:1638645)

 -- Barry Warsaw <email address hidden> Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:30:01 -0500

Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Yakkety):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-image has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-image - 1.0+16.04ubuntu1

---------------
ubuntu-image (1.0+16.04ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium

  * SRU tracking number LP: #1672755
  * Exit with a console message instead of crashing when the contents of a
    partition does not fit within the specified size. (LP:1666580)
  * Don't install an unusable global flake8 extension. (LP:1631156)
  * Fix the autopkgtests to use --output-dir instead of the obsolete
    --output command line switch. (LP:1667140)
  * Added ``--image-file-list`` command line argument to record the paths
    of all the disk image files written.
  * Added an autopkgtest to prove that generated images can be
    successfully booted (on amd64 only). (LP:1625732)
  * Add an autopkgtest for ensuring each PR has a changelog entry and a bug
    linked to it. (LP:1655671)
  * Make ubuntu-image a classic confinement snap. (LP:1638645)

 -- Barry Warsaw <email address hidden> Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:30:01 -0500

Changed in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.