All binary builds there have a test run incorporated.
This is not contemplated in this SRU, but is a step in the right direction.
The SRU started with backporting what's in artful, and there the tests don't run at package build time. Would such a change be accepted in the SRU'ed packages only? I.e., add tests at package build time for xenial and zesty, while artful (and bionic) don't have them yet?
Or maybe just a manual test run for trusty, xenial and zesty, and attach the logs to this bug? Given that upstream is now running tests at package build time for all of these. In trusty I can run the tests from this package as long as I install python 3.5 or 3.6 on it.
Ok, we managed to change the code a bit to support running tests with python 3.4, which is in trusty. But we did that for master only: /github. com/CanonicalLt d/ubuntu- advantage- script/ commit/ 4f6740e1a9b6106 eb5567f4be057ba ca82f23b91
https:/
Then a following packaging change to run the tests at package build time: /github. com/CanonicalLt d/ubuntu- advantage- script/ commit/ f3b6bfac5911f24 8499c79a42a0d18 f12ca9065a
https:/
Here is our recipe for daily builds with those two incorporated: /code.launchpad .net/~ahasenack /+recipe/ ubuntu- advantage- script- daily
https:/
All binary builds there have a test run incorporated.
This is not contemplated in this SRU, but is a step in the right direction.
The SRU started with backporting what's in artful, and there the tests don't run at package build time. Would such a change be accepted in the SRU'ed packages only? I.e., add tests at package build time for xenial and zesty, while artful (and bionic) don't have them yet?
Or maybe just a manual test run for trusty, xenial and zesty, and attach the logs to this bug? Given that upstream is now running tests at package build time for all of these. In trusty I can run the tests from this package as long as I install python 3.5 or 3.6 on it.