Stéphane Graber [2012-03-14 20:09 -0000]:
> Are you planning on fixing that one this week
Yes, I'm working on the "empty strings in GValue arrays" bug right
now, and I'm close to a solution. Once that's fixed, I'll continue
working on the "atomic list store append" patch, which is blocked by
the former.
> should I revert my ubiquity change so we still have a working manual
> partitioner when started from the live session? (it's currently in
> ubiquity's trunk but not release)
I still recommend just getting along with None values. There will be
another signal shortly after with the actual values.
But it now seems to me that making .append() atomic (in terms of sent
signals) is realistic after all, working on it as fast as I can.
Hello Stéphane,
Stéphane Graber [2012-03-14 20:09 -0000]:
> Are you planning on fixing that one this week
Yes, I'm working on the "empty strings in GValue arrays" bug right
now, and I'm close to a solution. Once that's fixed, I'll continue
working on the "atomic list store append" patch, which is blocked by
the former.
> should I revert my ubiquity change so we still have a working manual
> partitioner when started from the live session? (it's currently in
> ubiquity's trunk but not release)
I still recommend just getting along with None values. There will be
another signal shortly after with the actual values.
But it now seems to me that making .append() atomic (in terms of sent
signals) is realistic after all, working on it as fast as I can.
Martin
-- www.piware. de
Martin Pitt | http://
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)