can't get lucid installer to upgrade offline, without going over the net

Bug #574686 reported by Dan Connolly
32
This bug affects 7 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Expired
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

I'm trying to upgrade to Ubuntu 10.4 lucid from a torrent; I found directions
at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LucidUpgrades#Upgrading%20from%20a%20Torrent

Getting the torrent was no trouble; it took about 20 minutes to get
both the desktop and the alternate image (I didn't realize I needed
the alternate image until I had started getting the desktop image).

$ md5sum *i386*
5b2dadacfd692b4f2d5c7cf034539262 ubuntu-10.04-alternate-i386.iso
d044a2a0c8103fc3e5b7e18b0f7de1c8 ubuntu-10.04-desktop-i386.iso

Then I mounted the image a la:

$ sudo mount -o loop /home/connolly/Desktop/OpenSource/OpenSource-CD/ubuntu-10.04-alternate-i386.iso /media/cdrom0

and then I started the installer:

$ gksu "sh /cdrom/cdromupgrade"

At the "Include latest updates from the Internet?" dialog, I answered "No".
It says quite clearly: "If you answer 'no' here, the network is not used at all."

but then I get a "Do you want to start the upgrade?" dialog that
says "You have to download a total of 1,209M."

I thought perhaps "download" was a misnomer and that it would
get the packages locally, but
 (a) the network went *very* busy (estimating hours to days to complete), so I cancelled it;
 (b) I took the network down with "sudo ifdown eth0" and tried again,
  and it failed altogether

Then I thought perhaps the problem was related to using a mounted .iso image
rather than a physical CD, so I burned the image to CD and tried again.
Same symptoms (with the alternate and then the desktop CD).

I have logs of all of these attempts; I think the one with eth0 down is likely
to have the most information; let's see if I can figure out how to attach it...

Ugh... I don't see any way to attach files.
So I put it in http://pastebin.com/C5S97rRY

Hmm... package "linux" got attached to this question somewhow; I doubt
that's the relevant package, but I'm not sure which is... perhaps update-manager-core?

Revision history for this message
Dan Connolly (connolly) wrote :

I gather that unlike Answers, bugs can have files attached, so here's that log file again...

Revision history for this message
Alessandro Menti (elgaton) wrote :

I experienced a similar issue (the installer aborted when I answered "No" to the same question) and have found a simple, provisional workaround - see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/572634/comments/6.

Revision history for this message
Marja Erwin (marja-e) wrote :

I don't recall all the details, but I had similar trouble installing Xubuntu 11.10. I ultimately used the alternate installer, and had to skip the network-related steps, and ended up with a buggy install.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in ubiquity (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Marcus Tomlinson (marcustomlinson) wrote :

This release of Ubuntu is no longer receiving maintenance updates. If this is still an issue on a maintained version of Ubuntu please let us know.

Changed in ubiquity (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for ubiquity (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in ubiquity (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.