Comment 3 for bug 310088

One more suggestion: Don't name the trash command "trash-file" unless there are absolutely compulsory reasons for it. My arguments against "trash-file":
* It is not intuitive and therefore unnecessarily difficult to memorise.
* It is unnecessarily long.
* Every change in the name of programs causes confusion, so the new solution should be a clear improvement (which it isn't).
* It is even wrong: Directories can be trashed, too.

Just "trash" was much better.

However, I welcome the renaming of "restore-trash" to "trash-restore", "list-trash" to "trash-list" etc. This is intuitive and allows the user to look for the appropriate command with the tab key.