Speed limit of 0 is not honored

[suniltripathy]

Binary package hint: transmission

When I set speed limit to 0-0 for both DL & UL in specific hours, it still works. Means it cann't be left unattended.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Nov 4 06:21:14 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/transmission
Package: transmission-gtk 1.75-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_IN
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: transmission
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686

[Charles Kerr (charlesk)]

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:

* Is this reproducible?
* If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug?

This will help us to find and resolve the problem.

[Charles Kerr (charlesk)]

Just checking in with an update -- the fix for this lies in a kind of dodgy area in the Transmission code, so this probably is going to have to wait for post-1.80

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package transmission - 1.90-0ubuntu1

---------------
transmission (1.90-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low

  [ Krzysztof Klimonda ]
  * New upstream release (LP: #522726)
  * Fixes bugs:
    - Support Application Indicators (LP: #497882)
    - Better file preallocation with fallocate() (LP: #445592)
    - Speed limit of 0 is not honored (LP: #473652)
    - incorrectly sent information (LP: #521140)
  * Refreshed 99_autoreconf.patch
  * debian/control:
    - Build-Depend on libappindicator-dev

  [ Chris Coulson ]
  * Add ${misc:Depends} in debian/control to make Lintian happy
  * Update Standards-Version to 3.8.4. No other changes necessary
 -- Krzysztof Klimonda <email address hidden> Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:50:22 +0100