totem-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()

Bug #1292778 reported by Tommy
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
totem (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

I was trying to play an HD 720p *.mkv format video when this error happened.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: totem 3.10.1-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-17.37-generic 3.13.6
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-17-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.13.3-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Sat Mar 15 00:39:25 2014
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem-video-thumbnailer
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-03-14 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Alpha amd64 (20140313)
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/totem-video-thumbnailer -s 256 file:///home/username/Downloads/Toy.Story.Trilogy.1995-2010.720p.BluRay.x264-PublicHD/Toy.Story.1995.720p.BluRay.x264-BestHD.mkv /tmp/.gnome_desktop_thumbnail.GB65CX
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f73c3a50297 <g_slice_alloc+167>: mov (%rbx),%rax
 PC (0x7f73c3a50297) ok
 source "(%rbx)" (0x200000000000) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: totem
StacktraceTop:
 g_slice_alloc () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_slice_alloc0 () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstvideo-1.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstvideo-1.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstvideo-1.0.so.0
Title: totem-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Tommy (lodmot347) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1289125, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
Revision history for this message
Tommy (lodmot347) wrote :

The bug mentioned in the comment above seems to be non-existant..

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.