[MIR] tepl

[Sebastien Bacher]

= Availability =

Built for all supported architectures. In sync with Debian.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tepl/4.2.0-2

= Rationale =

gedit 3.35 started depending on it

= Security =
No known CVEs.

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/tepl
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tepl/+cve

= Quality assurance =
- Desktop Packages team is subscribed.
- The upstream tests are excuted in the package build

No bugs report on the Debian BTS/launchpad, the upstream list is short enough
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tepl
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=tepl
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tepl/issues

= Dependencies =
Depends on amtk (MIR bug #1862174)

= Standards compliance =
standard dh12 packaging

= Maintenance =
It's part of GNOME
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tepl

Maintained by pkg-gnome in Debian
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tepl

[Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)]

Depends on amtk (MIR bug #) -> Rejected, miss the other ref :p
Ok, more seriously:

Strong packaging practice: despite the missing trailing comma, dh has fail-missing, la files are removed, dh_autoreconf with --as-needed and symbols files present with makeshlibs with -c4. Hardening flags are enabled.
The code was part of the upstream gedit code, so OK.

Testsuite is executed during package build with a local dbus session.
However, is debian/README.source still relevant? If we look at debian/rules, the tests are setting: CHECK_HOME = $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/home before using HOME=$(CHECK_HOME), so this comment can be removed?

Some missing copyrights not referenced in debian/copright:
testsuite/test-fold-region.c: GNU Lesser General Public License (v2.1 or later)
  [Copyright: 2016 - David Rabel <email address hidden>]

I guess
testsuite/test-buffer-input-stream.c: GNU Lesser General Public License (v2.1 or later)
  [Copyright: 2010 - Ignacio Casal Quinteiro]
falls into the "1998-2012 GTK and Gtef contributors", even if it can be quite unclear for some people not knowing the GNOME community…

overall +1, even if I would prefer to have the above cleaned up

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

updated copyright holders
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/tepl/commit/f7c8f928

the outdated README.source information has been fixed in that commit
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/tepl/commit/cfe1f2f2

oh, and most important ... the description has been edited to add the bug reference ;-)

[Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)]

Perfect! Ack for me then, feel free to ping me or promote directly once the new gedit hit the archives. Thanks

[Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)]

tepl 4.3.1-1 in focal: universe/misc -> main
gir1.2-tepl-4 4.3.1-1 in focal amd64: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main
gir1.2-tepl-4 4.3.1-1 in focal arm64: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main
gir1.2-tepl-4 4.3.1-1 in focal armhf: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main
gir1.2-tepl-4 4.3.1-1 in focal ppc64el: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main
gir1.2-tepl-4 4.3.1-1 in focal s390x: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-0 4.3.1-1 in focal amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-0 4.3.1-1 in focal arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-0 4.3.1-1 in focal armhf: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-0 4.3.1-1 in focal ppc64el: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-0 4.3.1-1 in focal s390x: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-dev 4.3.1-1 in focal amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-dev 4.3.1-1 in focal arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-dev 4.3.1-1 in focal armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-dev 4.3.1-1 in focal ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main
libtepl-4-dev 4.3.1-1 in focal s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main
Override [y|N]? y
16 publications overridden.