| 2012-06-09 04:58:16 |
Daniel Carosone |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2012-06-09 04:59:50 |
Daniel Carosone |
description |
service --status-all reports some service status lines on stdout, others on stderr.
noticable and poblematic especially when piping to less/grep/etc.
presumably this is because it's calling multiple individual scripts each generating their own to inconsistent destinations.
workaround is to remember to 2>&1, but that is dumb; if the scripts can't be made consistent then perhaps at least service(8) can at least do this internally?
12.04 current dist-upgrade as of today |
service --status-all reports some service status lines on stdout, others on stderr.
noticable and problematic especially when piping to less/grep/etc.
presumably this is because it's calling multiple individual scripts each generating their own output to inconsistent destinations.
workaround is to remember to 2>&1, but that is dumb; if the scripts can't be made consistent then perhaps service(8) can at least do this internally?
12.04 current dist-upgrade as of today |
|
| 2012-06-09 05:14:33 |
Daniel Carosone |
description |
service --status-all reports some service status lines on stdout, others on stderr.
noticable and problematic especially when piping to less/grep/etc.
presumably this is because it's calling multiple individual scripts each generating their own output to inconsistent destinations.
workaround is to remember to 2>&1, but that is dumb; if the scripts can't be made consistent then perhaps service(8) can at least do this internally?
12.04 current dist-upgrade as of today |
service --status-all reports some service status lines on stdout, others on stderr.
noticable and problematic especially when piping to less/grep/etc.
presumably this is because it's calling multiple individual scripts each generating their own output to inconsistent destinations. Maybe there's some standard that says what these should do, and lots of bugs should be filed against each of the non-compliant ones?
workaround is to remember to 2>&1, but that is dumb; if the scripts can't be made consistent then perhaps service(8) can at least do this redirect internally?
12.04 current dist-upgrade as of today |
|
| 2012-06-09 07:31:12 |
Fabio Marconi |
tags |
|
precise |
|
| 2012-06-09 08:25:34 |
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot |
tags |
precise |
bot-comment precise |
|
| 2012-06-09 08:52:37 |
Fabio Marconi |
affects |
ubuntu |
sysvinit (Ubuntu) |
|
