systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.18 ADT test failure with linux/5.4.0-128.144
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
linux (Ubuntu) |
Incomplete
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Focal |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
systemd (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
Focal |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
[Impact]
The armhf autopkgtests currently fail in Focal due to this, and failures are not marked as regressions. This limits our ability to catch other regressions on armhf.
[Test Plan]
The boot-and-services autopkgtest should not fail on armhf. Specifically, the test_no_failed test should ignore systemd-
[Where problems could occur]
The fix is limited to the boot-and-services autopkgtest, so there is limited risk. Any bugs would show up in that test.
[Original Description]
This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running systemd tests for linux/5.4.0-128.144 on focal. Whether this is caused by the dep8 tests of the tested source or the kernel has yet to be determined.
Testing failed on:
armhf: https:/
Related branches
- Lukas Märdian: Approve
-
Diff: 508 lines (+444/-10)5 files modifieddebian/changelog (+18/-6)
debian/patches/CVE-2022-3821.patch (+37/-0)
debian/patches/CVE-2022-4415.patch (+386/-0)
debian/patches/series (+2/-0)
debian/tests/boot-and-services (+1/-4)
- Lukas Märdian: Approve
-
Diff: 409 lines (+346/-0)9 files modifieddebian/changelog (+20/-0)
debian/patches/lp1933090-test-seccomp-accept-ENOSYS-from-sysctl-2-too.patch (+25/-0)
debian/patches/lp2002445-netlink-do-not-fail-when-new-interface-name-is-already-us.patch (+50/-0)
debian/patches/lp2002445-netlink-introduce-rtnl_get-delete_link_alternative_names.patch (+102/-0)
debian/patches/lp2002445-sd-netlink-restore-altname-on-error-in-rtnl_set_link_name.patch (+64/-0)
debian/patches/lp2002445-udev-attempt-device-rename-even-if-interface-is-up.patch (+38/-0)
debian/patches/lp2002445-udev-net-allow-new-link-name-as-an-altname-before-renamin.patch (+36/-0)
debian/patches/series (+6/-0)
debian/tests/boot-and-services (+5/-0)
tags: | added: foundations-triage-discuss |
Changed in systemd (Ubuntu Focal): | |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in systemd (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Triaged → Invalid |
description: | updated |
To me it looks like the boot-and-services sub-tests got a lot less reliable on armhf in Focal. The previous systemd version had a higher chance of passing those. There always was root-unittests which required multiple attempts. But now from about 10 attempts there was one which had root-unittests only failing and the rest was roughly split between boot-and-services or both failing.