package udev 229-4ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
systemd (Ubuntu) |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: udev 229-4ubuntu10
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-38-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
Architecture: i386
CustomUdevRuleF
Date: Tue Oct 4 23:56:20 2016
DpkgHistoryLog:
Start-Date: 2016-10-04 23:55:59
Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-
Upgrade: libsystemd0:i386 (229-4ubuntu8, 229-4ubuntu10), udev:i386 (229-4ubuntu8, 229-4ubuntu10), libudev1:i386 (229-4ubuntu8, 229-4ubuntu10), systemd-sysv:i386 (229-4ubuntu8, 229-4ubuntu10), libpam-systemd:i386 (229-4ubuntu8, 229-4ubuntu10), systemd:i386 (229-4ubuntu8, 229-4ubuntu10)
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-09-18 (16 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 (20160420.1)
MachineType: HP-Pavilion 061 ER875AA-ABM SR1703LS
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=
RelatedPackageV
dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.1
apt 1.2.12~
SourcePackage: systemd
Title: package udev 229-4ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 01/18/2007
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 3.24
dmi.board.name: Asterope
dmi.board.vendor: ECS
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmerican
dmi.product.name: ER875AA-ABM SR1703LS
dmi.product.
dmi.sys.vendor: HP-Pavilion 061
tags: | removed: need-duplicate-check |
Changed in systemd (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → Won't Fix |
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.