[needs-packaging] libsystemd-daemon.so.0 needs-packaging
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | systemd (Ubuntu) |
Wishlist
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
http://
this is a compatibility package and is needed to build upstream xen 4.5.0 in vivid 15.04
./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-systemd --enable-ocamltools
| tags: | added: needs-packaging |
| description: | updated |
| Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : | #1 |
| summary: |
- libsystemd-daemon.so.0 needs-packaging + [needs-packaging] libsystemd-daemon.so.0 needs-packaging |
| Changed in systemd (Ubuntu): | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
| Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : | #2 |
You can build that using libsystemd-
| Changed in systemd (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Won't Fix |
| status: | Won't Fix → Invalid |
| Mark Pryor (tlviewer) wrote : | #3 |
libsystemd-
please package this shared object. Why can Fedora 22/23 get this right, but the Ubuntu+1 team can not?
| Mark Pryor (tlviewer) wrote : | #4 |
Marty claims I can build it and I've seen freedesktop.org posts says I can too if I have sd-daemon.c
Is sd-daemon.c the true source? I can't find this in any Vivid *.dsc
| Mark Pryor (tlviewer) wrote : | #5 |
here is the upstream tree
http://
sd-daemon.c is the source of interest
| Mark Pryor (tlviewer) wrote : | #6 |
Looking at system-219 from upstream now.
In order to build libsystemd-
./configure --enable-
| Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : | #7 |
We do use --enable-


*** This is an automated message ***
This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug reports specification, https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/QATeam/ Specs/NeedsPack agingBugs, all needs-packaging bug reports have Wishlist importance. Subsequently, I'm setting this bug's status to Wishlist.