[udev] /dev/disk/by-path missing
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ceph (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
systemd (Ubuntu) |
Won't Fix
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Latest cloud image for Ubuntu Saucy; /dev/disk/by-path is missing:
ubuntu@
/dev/disk
/dev/disk/by-uuid
/dev/disk/
/dev/disk/by-label
/dev/disk/
/dev/disk/
ubuntu@
I've not seen this in < Saucy and can repeat this reliably using the saucy daily images.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: udev 204-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.9.0-6-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.10.2-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDmesg: [ 6.952094] init: plymouth-stop pre-start process (1125) terminated with status 1
Date: Sat Jun 22 21:32:23 2013
Ec2AMI: ami-0000002a
Ec2AMIManifest: FIXME
Ec2Availability
Ec2InstanceType: m1.tiny
Ec2Kernel: aki-00000002
Ec2Ramdisk: ari-00000002
Lsusb:
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0627:0001 Adomax Technology Co., Ltd
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
MachineType: OpenStack Foundation OpenStack Nova
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
TERM=screen
PATH=(custom, no user)
XDG_RUNTIME_
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=
SourcePackage: systemd
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 01/01/2011
dmi.bios.vendor: Bochs
dmi.bios.version: Bochs
dmi.chassis.type: 1
dmi.chassis.vendor: Bochs
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnBochs:
dmi.product.name: OpenStack Nova
dmi.product.
dmi.sys.vendor: OpenStack Foundation
summary: |
- /dev/disk/by-path missing in saucy cloud image + [udev] /dev/disk/by-path missing |
Changed in systemd (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in systemd (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Incomplete → Won't Fix |
I bisected this down to http:// git.kernel. org/cgit/ linux/hotplug/ udev.git/ commit/ ?id=481dcf7c8f; reverting it makes the by-path/ reappear, but disabling it for ATA devices (which only have a SCSI driver, but are not physically SCSI) was quite deliberate. Is this causing actual problems, or did you just happen to notice it?