diff -u sysprof-1.0.9/debian/changelog sysprof-1.0.9/debian/changelog
--- sysprof-1.0.9/debian/changelog
+++ sysprof-1.0.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+sysprof (1.0.9-1ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
+
+  * Rebuild for recent libbfd (from binutils) and link statically
+    against it (LP: #46224)
+    Add debian/patches/static-libbfd.dpatch from Debian BTS,
+    provided by Michel Dänzer.
+  * Better help in case the sysprof-module is not loaded/available
+    (LP: #30160)
+    Add debian/patches/better_help_for_missing_module.dpatch
+  * debian/control: Standards-Version 3.7.3
+  * Modify Maintainer value to match the DebianMaintainerField
+    specification.
+
+ -- Daniel Hahler <ubuntu@thequod.de>  Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:27:38 +0100
+
 sysprof (1.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -u sysprof-1.0.9/debian/control sysprof-1.0.9/debian/control
--- sysprof-1.0.9/debian/control
+++ sysprof-1.0.9/debian/control
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
 Source: sysprof
 Section: devel
 Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org>
+Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com>
+XSBC-Original-Maintainer: Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org>
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37), autotools-dev, automake1.9, binutils-dev (>= 2.17-1), bzip2, libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.6.0), libglade2-dev, dpatch
-Standards-Version: 3.7.2
+Standards-Version: 3.7.3
 
 Package: sysprof
 Architecture: i386 amd64
diff -u sysprof-1.0.9/debian/patches/00list sysprof-1.0.9/debian/patches/00list
--- sysprof-1.0.9/debian/patches/00list
+++ sysprof-1.0.9/debian/patches/00list
@@ -2,0 +3,2 @@
+better_help_for_missing_module
+static-libbfd
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- sysprof-1.0.9.orig/debian/patches/better_help_for_missing_module.dpatch
+++ sysprof-1.0.9/debian/patches/better_help_for_missing_module.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## better_help_for_missing_module.dpatch by Daniel Hahler <ubuntu@thequod.de>
+##
+## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
+## DP: Better help in case the sysprof-module is not loaded. (LP: #30160)
+
+@DPATCH@
+diff -urNad sysprof-1.0.9~/sysprof.c sysprof-1.0.9/sysprof.c
+--- sysprof-1.0.9~/sysprof.c	2007-10-21 23:43:43.000000000 +0200
++++ sysprof-1.0.9/sysprof.c	2008-01-23 23:00:59.503183308 +0100
+@@ -560,7 +560,14 @@
+ 		       "\n"
+ 		       "       modprobe sysprof-module\n"
+ 		       "\n"
+-		       "as root.");
++		       "as root.\n"
++		       "\n"
++		       "You may need to build and install this module first:\n"
++		       "  1. Install the package sysprof-module-source\n"
++		       "  2. Execute \"m-a a-i sysprof-module\"\n"
++		       "  3. Load the module as described above\n"
++		       "  4. Restart sysprof\n"
++		       "See also /usr/share/doc/sysprof-module-source/README.Debian" );
+ 		
+ 		update_sensitivity (app);
+ 		return;
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- sysprof-1.0.9.orig/debian/patches/static-libbfd.dpatch
+++ sysprof-1.0.9/debian/patches/static-libbfd.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## static-libbfd.dpatch by Daniel Hahler <ubuntu@thequod.de>
+##
+## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
+## DP: Link statically against libbfd, because this changes often
+## DP: with new binutils uploads and linking against the shared
+## DP: libbfd is forbidden (see desc of binutils-dev).
+## DP: Debian bug: #439272, LP: #46224
+## DP: Patch from Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>
+
+@DPATCH@
+diff -urNad sysprof-1.0.9~/configure sysprof-1.0.9/configure
+--- sysprof-1.0.9~/configure	2007-10-21 23:42:22.000000000 +0200
++++ sysprof-1.0.9/configure	2008-01-23 22:49:11.255186239 +0100
+@@ -3759,7 +3759,7 @@
+ { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $ac_cv_lib_bfd_bfd_get_error" >&5
+ echo "${ECHO_T}$ac_cv_lib_bfd_bfd_get_error" >&6; }
+ if test $ac_cv_lib_bfd_bfd_get_error = yes; then
+-  DEP_LIBS="$DEP_LIBS -lbfd -liberty"
++  DEP_LIBS="$DEP_LIBS /usr/lib/libbfd.a -liberty"
+ else
+   { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: libbfd is required to compile sysprof" >&5
+ echo "$as_me: error: libbfd is required to compile sysprof" >&2;}
+diff -urNad sysprof-1.0.9~/configure.ac sysprof-1.0.9/configure.ac
+--- sysprof-1.0.9~/configure.ac	2007-10-21 23:42:16.000000000 +0200
++++ sysprof-1.0.9/configure.ac	2008-01-23 22:49:11.259187385 +0100
+@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
+   AC_CHECK_LIB(iberty, cplus_demangle_opname, [],
+     AC_MSG_ERROR([libiberty is required to compile sysprof]), -ldl))
+ 
+-AC_CHECK_LIB(bfd, bfd_get_error, [DEP_LIBS="$DEP_LIBS -lbfd -liberty"],
++AC_CHECK_LIB(bfd, bfd_get_error, [DEP_LIBS="$DEP_LIBS /usr/lib/libbfd.a -liberty"],
+   AC_MSG_ERROR([libbfd is required to compile sysprof]),
+   -liberty)
+