synergys assert failure: synergys: CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:286: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.

Bug #672320 reported by Leo Arias
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
synergy (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: synergy

I have two machines sharing resources with synergy.
This one is the server. I powered on the client and logged in, and this error appeared.
However, synergy is working without issues after that.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: synergy 1.3.1-6ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
AssertionMessage: synergys: CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:286: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.
Date: Sun Nov 7 15:23:07 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/synergys
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Beta amd64 (20100901.1)
ProcCmdline: synergys
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=eo:eo:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=eo.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: synergy
StacktraceTop:
 raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
 __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Title: synergys assert failure: synergys: CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:286: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Leo Arias (elopio) wrote :
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #420088, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.