synergyc assert failure: synergyc: CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:286: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| synergy (Ubuntu) |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: synergy
Package: synergy
Release: Alpha 3 lucid
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
AssertionMessage: synergyc: CArchMultithrea
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Tue Mar 9 13:13:22 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/synergyc
NonfreeKernelMo
Package: synergy 1.3.1-6ubuntu1
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/synergyc 10.9.44.62
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, no user)
SHELL=/bin/false
ProcVersionSign
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: synergy
StacktraceTop:
*__GI_raise (sig=<value optimized out>)
*__GI_abort () at abort.c:92
*__GI_
?? ()
?? ()
Title: synergyc assert failure: synergyc: CArchMultithrea
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64
UserGroups:
| LukeW (lwoydziak) wrote | #1 |
| Apport retracing service (apport) wrote This bug is a duplicate | #2 |
| visibility: | private → public |
| tags: | removed: need-amd64-retrace |
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #419486, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.