Activity log for bug #8952

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2006-03-11 15:28:34 Matthias Klose openoffice.org: assignee doko
2006-03-11 15:28:34 Matthias Klose openoffice.org: statusexplanation Bugzilla status=NEW, product=Ubuntu, component=openoffice.org reassigning back, there are no suitable sections for an office application.
2006-04-10 12:02:23 Matthias Klose synaptic: status Unconfirmed Confirmed
2006-04-10 12:02:23 Matthias Klose synaptic: statusexplanation reassigning back, there are no suitable sections for an office application.
2006-08-06 08:13:53 Matthias Klose openoffice.org: statusexplanation Again, reassigning back, there are no suitable sections for an office application. I don't see any rationale within the bug trace for reassigning the report to OOo. We do have a fixed set of pockets/sections, so nothing can be done about it in the OOo packages.
2007-04-17 21:07:48 Marco Rodrigues synaptic: assignee mvo
2007-04-17 21:07:48 Marco Rodrigues synaptic: statusexplanation Again, reassigning back, there are no suitable sections for an office application. I don't see any rationale within the bug trace for reassigning the report to OOo. We do have a fixed set of pockets/sections, so nothing can be done about it in the OOo packages.
2007-10-16 19:40:47 Michael Vogt title Openoffice should be in section "Word processing", not "Editors". There should be a section "Office" in the archive (was: Openoffice should be in section "Word processing", not "Editors".)
2009-06-09 17:40:28 Michael Vogt synaptic (Ubuntu): assignee Michael Vogt (mvo)
2010-09-16 19:40:44 Mathieu Pillard removed subscriber Mathieu Pillard
2010-09-17 20:10:05 rusivi2 bug added subscriber rusivi1
2012-02-17 14:22:34 Robert Roth bug added subscriber Robert Roth
2013-04-15 06:22:24 Daniel Hartwig summary There should be a section "Office" in the archive (was: Openoffice should be in section "Word processing", not "Editors".) Text sections label should be "text processing" not "word processing"