2006-03-11 15:28:34 |
Matthias Klose |
openoffice.org: assignee |
doko |
|
|
2006-03-11 15:28:34 |
Matthias Klose |
openoffice.org: statusexplanation |
Bugzilla status=NEW, product=Ubuntu, component=openoffice.org |
reassigning back, there are no suitable sections for an office application.
|
|
2006-04-10 12:02:23 |
Matthias Klose |
synaptic: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
2006-04-10 12:02:23 |
Matthias Klose |
synaptic: statusexplanation |
reassigning back, there are no suitable sections for an office application.
|
|
|
2006-08-06 08:13:53 |
Matthias Klose |
openoffice.org: statusexplanation |
|
Again, reassigning back, there are no suitable sections for an office application. I don't see any rationale within the bug trace for reassigning the report to OOo. We do have a fixed set of pockets/sections, so nothing can be done about it in the OOo packages.
|
|
2007-04-17 21:07:48 |
Marco Rodrigues |
synaptic: assignee |
|
mvo |
|
2007-04-17 21:07:48 |
Marco Rodrigues |
synaptic: statusexplanation |
Again, reassigning back, there are no suitable sections for an office application. I don't see any rationale within the bug trace for reassigning the report to OOo. We do have a fixed set of pockets/sections, so nothing can be done about it in the OOo packages.
|
|
|
2007-10-16 19:40:47 |
Michael Vogt |
title |
Openoffice should be in section "Word processing", not "Editors". |
There should be a section "Office" in the archive (was: Openoffice should be in section "Word processing", not "Editors".) |
|
2009-06-09 17:40:28 |
Michael Vogt |
synaptic (Ubuntu): assignee |
Michael Vogt (mvo) |
|
|
2010-09-16 19:40:44 |
Mathieu Pillard |
removed subscriber Mathieu Pillard |
|
|
|
2010-09-17 20:10:05 |
rusivi2 |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber rusivi1 |
2012-02-17 14:22:34 |
Robert Roth |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Robert Roth |
2013-04-15 06:22:24 |
Daniel Hartwig |
summary |
There should be a section "Office" in the archive (was: Openoffice should be in section "Word processing", not "Editors".) |
Text sections label should be "text processing" not "word processing" |
|