Web browsers should share the cache

Bug #888662 reported by Fred
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
amaya (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
chimera2 (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
dillo (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
dooble (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
elinks (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Wishlist
Unassigned
epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
links (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
links2 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
luakit (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Herminio
lynx-cur (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
netrik (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
netsurf (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
surf (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
uzbl (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
w3m (Ubuntu)
Opinion
Undecided
Unassigned
xxxterm (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Web browsers should share the browser cache;
* Reduce disk usage
* Reduce network bandwidth usage
* Make it easier to clean the cache
* Unify and centralize common cache

Tags: cache
tags: added: cache
Revision history for this message
Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) wrote :

Please don't do that. Suddenly creating bugs like this against a bazillion packages spams lots of people, and really isn't cool (especially when you haven't discussed your idea with anybody, and there isn't really much hope you'll ever find anybody to do this for you)

no longer affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
no longer affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
Fred (eldmannen+launchpad) wrote :

Oh sorry, I just thought it was a really good idea.

Because I thought it was so dumb that all web browsers use cache and they all fetch the same stuff, but store it in different places.

Revision history for this message
Thomas Dickey (dickey-his) wrote :

not relevant

Changed in lynx (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Andreas Moog (ampelbein)
no longer affects: lynx (Ubuntu)
Micah Gersten (micahg)
no longer affects: seamonkey (Ubuntu)
Changed in lynx-cur (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
no longer affects: kde-baseapps (Ubuntu)
no longer affects: arora (Ubuntu)
no longer affects: rekonq (Ubuntu)
Micah Gersten (micahg)
no longer affects: midori (Ubuntu)
no longer affects: kazehakase (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
Axel Beckert (xtaran) wrote : Re: [Bug 888662] Re: Web browsers should share the cache

Hi Fred,

Fred wrote:
> Oh sorry, I just thought it was a really good idea.

It actually is a good _idea_, just not a very realistic one. :-(

Even all the Mozilla based browsers aren't sharing their caches
despite the file format is the same. And it seems as if this wanted by
Mozilla for some reason.

> Because I thought it was so dumb that all web browsers use cache and
> they all fetch the same stuff, but store it in different places.

You basically just asked at the wrong place: No Linux distribution has
the power to convince all the browser makers, especially Mozilla and
Google (who both care a shit about distributions IMHO), to do such a
thing. And it's the browser makers where this should start. Maybe the
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) is a better place to dump/plant this
wish/idea.

  Regards, Axel (with his links{,2}, dillo and conkeror maintainer hat on)
--
 ,''`. | Axel Beckert <email address hidden>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5

Dave Walker (davewalker)
Changed in elinks (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Fred (eldmannen+launchpad) wrote :

Axel Beckert wrote:
> It actually is a good _idea_, just not a very realistic one. :-(

Stallman once wanted to create a free software operating system.
Many would say that it is not a very realistic idea.

Many maybe would say the XDG standard was a good idea, but not a very realistic one.
Now plenty of applications save under ~/.config/

If there is a will, there is a way.
For starters, browsers which share the same cache format could have their directories symlinked.

Scott Moser (smoser)
Changed in elinks (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Changed in w3m (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Revision history for this message
Eriberto (eriberto) wrote :

Not a bug. A generic opinion only.

Changed in xxxterm (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
Changed in surf (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Changed in luakit (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Herminio (herminio-hernandezjr)
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Lenin (gagarin) wrote :

invalid for links2 since it doesn't have a filesystem cache

Changed in links2 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Lenin (gagarin)
Changed in netsurf (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
Changed in uzbl (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Changed in netrik (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Changed in links (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Changed in amaya (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Changed in chimera2 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Changed in dillo (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Changed in dooble (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
Changed in epiphany-browser (Ubuntu):
status: New → Opinion
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.