sreadahead crashed with SIGSEGV in __pause_nocancel()

Bug #437674 reported by Simon Déziel
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
sreadahead (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: sreadahead

I have reported the same bug (bug #434948) but it was marked as a duplicate of bug #414597. There is another person that was affected by the bug I reported and both of us are unable to access bug #414597. We get a permission denied.

For my bug with sreadahead, I've found that it only *occurs* when I open the palimpsest disk utility.

lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu karmic (development branch)
Release: 9.10

apt-cache policy gnome-disk-utility
gnome-disk-utility:
  Installed: 2.28.0-0ubuntu2
  Candidate: 2.28.0-0ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 0
        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Sun Sep 27 09:48:18 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /sbin/sreadahead
Package: sreadahead 1.0-3
ProcCmdline: /sbin/sreadahead -t 0
ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.36-generic
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x401ed5: mov (%r15,%rdi,1),%dil
 PC (0x00401ed5) ok
 source "(%r15,%rdi,1)" (0x7fad45eaa010) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%dil" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: sreadahead
StacktraceTop:
 __pause_nocancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
 ?? ()
 __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Title: sreadahead crashed with SIGSEGV in __pause_nocancel()
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64
UserGroups:

Simon Déziel (sdeziel)
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #414597, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.