software-properties-gtk crashed with ValueError in run(): <aptsources.sourceslist.SourceEntry object at 0x2888e10> is not in list

Bug #852411 reported by Mac
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
software-properties (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Tried to edit software source name to reflect the required distribution. Asked then to Authenticate and following this the Application crashed.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: software-properties-gtk 0.81.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.18-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-11-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Sep 17 08:55:35 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/software-properties-gtk']
SourcePackage: software-properties
Title: software-properties-gtk crashed with ValueError in run(): <aptsources.sourceslist.SourceEntry object at 0x2888e10> is not in list
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Mac (andrew-xiion) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Mac (andrew-xiion) wrote :

1st Crash Report said that there were missing libs. These were installed and ONLY on a reboot did I subsequently discover the missing libraries fixed the issue.

Mac (andrew-xiion)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #829286, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
visibility: private → public
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.