software-properties-gtk crashed with ValueError in run(): <aptsources.sourceslist.SourceEntry object at 0x2830090> is not in list

Bug #838935 reported by Peter Bomars
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
software-properties (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu oneiric (development branch)
Release: 11.10

apt-cache policy software-properties-gtk
software-properties-gtk:
  Installed: 0.81.9
  Candidate: 0.81.9
  Version table:
 *** 0.81.9 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

EXPECTED: Ability to edit DEB lines to another dist (oneiric -> natty)
OBSERVED: crash, edits don't stick

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: software-properties-gtk 0.81.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-9.15-generic 3.0.3
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-9-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Sep 1 09:28:02 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Alpha amd64 (20110803.1)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/software-properties-gtk']
SourcePackage: software-properties
Title: software-properties-gtk crashed with ValueError in run(): <aptsources.sourceslist.SourceEntry object at 0x2830090> is not in list
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Peter Bomars (pbomars) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #829286, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
visibility: private → public
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.