Utopic -> Vivid upgrade fails because no Vivid extras repo exists

Bug #1403103 reported by Erick Brunzell
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #1409555: drop extras.ubuntu.com. Edit Remove
40
This bug affects 8 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
software-properties (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Sorry if I filed this against the wrong package but it was a best guess. In anticipation of Ubuntu GNOME Vivid Alpha 1 I attempted and upgrade from Utopic to Vivid and get this error message:

W:Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/vivid/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found
, W:Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/vivid/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found
, E:Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: software-properties-gtk 0.94
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-28.37-generic 3.16.7-ckt1
Uname: Linux 3.16.0-28-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8
Architecture: i386
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Tue Dec 16 08:58:40 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-10-18 (58 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 14.04.1 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release i386 (20140722.2)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: software-properties
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to utopic on 2014-12-16 (0 days ago)

Revision history for this message
Erick Brunzell (lbsolost) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Erick Brunzell (lbsolost) wrote :

The upgrade starts as expected if you first disable the extras/independent repos in software sources.

tags: added: release-upgrader vivid
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in software-properties (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Bruce Pieterse (octoquad) wrote :

This has been present since 12th December (day I started testing on vivid) on a post-installation of vivid which I'm running off everyday:

..snip..
Get:17 http://security.ubuntu.com vivid-security/multiverse amd64 Packages [14 B]
Err http://extras.ubuntu.com vivid/main Sources
  404 Not Found
Get:18 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com vivid/restricted Sources [5,872 B]
Get:19 http://security.ubuntu.com vivid-security/main i386 Packages [14 B]
Get:20 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com vivid/universe Sources [6,991 kB]
Err http://extras.ubuntu.com vivid/main amd64 Packages
  404 Not Found
Get:21 http://security.ubuntu.com vivid-security/restricted i386 Packages [14 B]
Err http://extras.ubuntu.com vivid/main i386 Packages
  404 Not Found
Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com vivid/main Translation-en_GB
Get:22 http://security.ubuntu.com vivid-security/universe i386 Packages [14 B]
Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com vivid/main Translation-en
..snip..
Fetched 28.7 MB in 1min 1s (464 kB/s)
W: Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/vivid/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found

W: Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/vivid/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found

W: Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/vivid/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found

E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

Revision history for this message
Erick Brunzell (lbsolost) wrote :

@ Bruce Pieterse, if you need the packages offered by the extras/independent repos you can use the Utopic versions of just those repos for the time being until the Vivid versions are built.

Changed in software-properties (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu QA Website (ubuntuqa) wrote :

This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.

A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1403103

tags: added: iso-testing
Revision history for this message
Erick Brunzell (lbsolost) wrote :

I assume this can just be retired when the actual fix for bug #1409555 drops???

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.