Comment 15 for bug 874242
Revision history for this message
| Michael Vogt (mvo) wrote Re: Re: "Single sign on page doesn't look secure" --> well it isn't :> | #15 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
67d34a1
(Get the code!)
Here is something that we should propose to upstream for P. I actually would really like to have it in a security update as well, but I can see that its controversial.
At the same time IMO it simply does not make sense to have a settings "ssl-strict" and "ssl-ca-file" and only when settings the later the former is honored. I also think that ssl-strict and no ssl_ca_in_creds should be a failure, I will attach a seperate patch.