software-center crashed with TypeError in upstream_version_compare(): must be string, not None

Bug #756634 reported by Rigved Rakshit
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
software-center (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: software-center

Description: Ubuntu Natty (development branch)
Release: 11.04
Installed: 3.1.24.3
Candidate: 3.1.24.3
Expected outcome: Software Center should have closed without any error.
Actual outcome: An error occurred while exiting the application. Something about a wrong return type from a function. It probably can be fixed by returning an empty string instead of "None".

Even though there is a bug report for this for Maverick, I still encountered this error in Narwhal.
In Maverick, the report number is #746120.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: software-center 3.1.24.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Apr 10 15:12:24 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/software-center/software-center
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Beta i386 (20110330)
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/software-center
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/software-center']
SourcePackage: software-center
Title: software-center crashed with TypeError in upstream_version_compare(): must be string, not None
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Rigved Rakshit (rigved) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #746120, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
visibility: private → public
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.