insInconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 541: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `ELFW(R_TYPE) (reloc->r_info) == R_X86_64_RELATIVE' failed!

Bug #1926705 reported by deris rinaldi
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
snapd (Ubuntu)
Expired
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

when I run the snap command an error appears insInconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 541: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `ELFW (R_TYPE) (reloc-> r_info) == failed! R_X86_64_RELATIVE 'failed!

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: snapd 2.48.3+20.04
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-50.56~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-50-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Apr 30 14:16:12 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-26 (94 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
SourcePackage: snapd
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.sudoers.d.99-snapd.conf: [inaccessible: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/etc/sudoers.d/99-snapd.conf']

Revision history for this message
deris rinaldi (deris) wrote :
affects: ubuntu → snapd (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
Sergio Schvezov (sergiusens) wrote :

It looks like snapd 2.49.2 (revno 11588) was built using the currently reverted libc6:

    - libc6-dev-i386=2.23-0ubuntu11.2
    - libc6-dev-x32=2.23-0ubuntu11.2
    - libc6-dev=2.23-0ubuntu11.2
    - libc6-i386=2.23-0ubuntu11.2
    - libc6-x32=2.23-0ubuntu11.2
    - libc6=2.23-0ubuntu11.2

Revision history for this message
Ian Johnson (anonymouse67) wrote :

To be clear, the snapd and core snaps for 2.49.2 were not built with the recently reverted libc6, that was only for focal which affected the core20 snap, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-core20/+bug/1926355 for details on that bug. This is a separate issue

Revision history for this message
Sergio Schvezov (sergiusens) wrote :

Thanks for following up, I missed that part. This must be something else.

Revision history for this message
Maciej Borzecki (maciek-borzecki) wrote :

I do not see this problem with snapd-2.49.2+20.04 installed from the archive. Please check on you system after running an update.

Changed in snapd (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for snapd (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in snapd (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.