SMPlayer can't correct detect version of installed mplayer

Bug #606607 reported by Ákos Maróy
42
This bug affects 8 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
mplayer (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
smplayer (Ubuntu)
Triaged
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

I installed mplayer and smplayer as a GUI frontend to mplayer, but when I start smplayer, it reports that it is obsolete, and the mplayer that is installed with it 'too new'.

smplayer reports 0.6.8, while mplayer reports MPlayer SVN-r1.0~rc3+svn20090426-4.4.3

my expectation would be that these packages would be in sync...

Revision history for this message
kurt belgrave (trinikrono) wrote : Re: smplayer outdated in lucid

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage. I have classified this bug as a bug in smplayer.

When reporting bugs in the future please use apport, either via the appropriate application's "Help -> Report a Problem" menu or using 'ubuntu-bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.

summary: - smplayer outdated
+ smplayer outdated in lucid
affects: ubuntu → smplayer (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
rvm (rvm) wrote :

Actually the mplayer build in lucid is not obsolete, but it seems the ubuntu developers changed the mplayer identification string and smplayer fails to recognize the mplayer version.

smplayer expects something like this:

MPlayer SVN-r31037-3.3.4 (C) 2000-2010 MPlayer Team

I think the mplayer package in my PPA doesn't have this problem:
https://launchpad.net/~rvm/+archive/mplayer

Revision history for this message
Maia Everett (linneris) wrote :

Reassigned to mplayer for now.

Changed in smplayer (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Reinhard Tartler (siretart) wrote :

what's the problem with smplayer and mplayer not reporting the same version?

smplayer is a frontend to mplayer and is developed pretty much independently. So this is not exactly suprising to me

Revision history for this message
Maia Everett (linneris) wrote :

The bug here is that mplayer in Ubuntu reports the version number in a different format from the upstream mplayer, confusing smplayer and making it think mplayer is outdated.

Revision history for this message
Reinhard Tartler (siretart) wrote : Re: [Bug 606607] Re: smplayer outdated in lucid

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 21:24:42 (EDT), Maia Kozheva wrote:

> The bug here is that mplayer in Ubuntu reports the version number in a
> different format from the upstream mplayer, confusing smplayer and
> making it think mplayer is outdated.

what would be a better format?

please note that we ship release branches, not trunk. I think we should
better fix smplayer to not be that confused instead.

--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

Revision history for this message
RussianNeuroMancer (russianneuromancer) wrote : Re: smplayer outdated in lucid

> Please note that we ship release branches, not trunk.
> I think we should better fix smplayer to not be that confused instead.
Then it's still smplayer issue?

Changed in smplayer (Ubuntu):
status: Invalid → New
summary: - smplayer outdated in lucid
+ SMPlayer can't correct detect version of installed mplayer
Revision history for this message
RussianNeuroMancer (russianneuromancer) wrote :

Also same issue with fresh mplayer 1.0rc4 and SMPlayer 0.6.9.1 in Maverick.

Revision history for this message
kurt belgrave (trinikrono) wrote :

Closing in mplayer as issue lies in smplayer.
Cheers

Changed in mplayer (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
kurt belgrave (trinikrono) wrote :

Confirming bug

PLease look at:

 Version 0.6.0rc1

(2008-01-30)
 * Added the Korean translation, by Heesu Yoon <email address hidden>

(2008-01-29)
 * If a version is not recognized, assume it's an old version instead of new.
   This way at least the file will play.
 * Now smplayer should recognize the mplayer version from ubuntu packages
   (MPlayer 2:1.0~rc1-0ubuntu13.1 (C) 2000-2006 MPlayer Team).
 * Changed some defaults in preferences: framedrop will be enabled, and
   subtitles on screenshots disabled.
from
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/smplayer/index.php?title=Changelog_0.6.xx

I hope this helps
cheers

Changed in smplayer (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
kurt belgrave (trinikrono) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as Triaged and let them handle it from here. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better! Please report any other issues you may find.

Marking Low per kurt belgrave.

Changed in smplayer (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Hans Flipser (verhansa) wrote : Stop paying so much for what you know already. business hotel in tokyo

   Hullo !
   Customer

Add Bacehlors, Masetrs or Masetrs Degeres to your resume in just 4-6 weeks and open avenues to promotion and better jobs!

Regardless of your location, you can receive a degree in your desired field. All you need is sufficient knowledge, military, or professional experience and you are on your way to an instant degree in your relevant field.

No Study!. No Class!. At your Own Pace!.

Think of it, within four to six weeks, you too could be a clolege graduate. Many people share the same frustration, they are doing the work of the person that has the degree and the person that has the degree is getting all the money.

------------------
Give us a call NOW!

+ 1 - 646 - 537 - 1732
Please leave us your:
1) Your Name
2) Your Country
3) Phone No. with countrycode if outside USA

We will get back to you ASAP
------------------

Do Not Reply to this Email.
We do not reply to text inquiries, and our server will reject all response traffic.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.