scanning with sane net backend gives "maximum amount of allocated memory exceeded"

Bug #1184582 reported by Philipp Schlesinger
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
simple-scan (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Device: Epson Perfection 3490 (connected via sane net backend)

Scanning works via sane and xsane. When trying to scan with simple-scan, I get:

[sanei_wire] sanei_w_array: DECODE: maximum amount of allocated memory exceeded (limit: 1048576, new allocation: 3220728352, total: 3221776928 bytes)

and a dialog saying:
"Username and password required to access 'net:hostname.local:sane_control_option(handle=%p,option=%d,action=%d,value=%p,info=%p)'"

with xsane, no username/password is needed and it should work without.

Revision history for this message
Philipp Schlesinger (philipp-sadleder) wrote :
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Philipp Schlesinger (philipp-sadleder) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Philipp Schlesinger (philipp-sadleder) wrote :

Important additional information: scanning via sane net backend and simple-scan worked in earlier versions of Ubuntu (with the very same configuration of sane on client and server)

Revision history for this message
Philipp Schlesinger (philipp-sadleder) wrote :

The same happens when trying to scan via net backend on localhost (simple-scan and saned on the same host).
So this is not an architecture/version mismatch problem.

affects: ubuntu → simple-scan (Ubuntu)
Michael Nagel (nailor)
Changed in simple-scan (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in simple-scan:
status: New → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Philipp Schlesinger (philipp-sadleder) wrote :

Now that this bug ist triaged, is there additional input needed to solve that bug?
I'd very much like to be of any help if possible.

Revision history for this message
Michael Nagel (nailor) wrote :

I do not think there is some piece of information that is obviously missing.

However, please note that I did no want to imply that someone is actually working on this -- as that would be outright untrue.

Revision history for this message
Philipp Schlesinger (philipp-sadleder) wrote :

Michael, thanks for your answer.

After all, while involving other hardware and client programs, the following bug looks very similar:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635914

Revision history for this message
penalvch (penalvch) wrote :

Philipp Schlesinger, thank you for reporting this and helping make Ubuntu better.

As per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases your release is EOL.

If you have an issue in a supported release (ex. 16.04) please file a new report, and feel free to subscribe me to it.

no longer affects: simple-scan (Ubuntu)
affects: simple-scan (Debian) → simple-scan (Ubuntu)
no longer affects: simple-scan (Ubuntu)
affects: simple-scan → simple-scan (Ubuntu)
Changed in simple-scan (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.