package libsignon-plugins-common1:amd64 8.57+15.10.20150616-0ubuntu2~gcc5.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

Bug #1567008 reported by Warren Grider
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
signon (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

was installing updates. left and returned later ubuntu said there was a problem removing a file

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
Package: libsignon-plugins-common1:amd64 8.57+15.10.20150616-0ubuntu2~gcc5.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-27.32-generic 4.2.8-ckt1
Uname: Linux 4.2.0-27-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Apr 6 07:49:19 2016
DuplicateSignature: package:libsignon-plugins-common1:amd64:8.57+15.10.20150616-0ubuntu2~gcc5.1:package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-15 (50 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.2ubuntu5.1
 apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu1
SourcePackage: signon
Title: package libsignon-plugins-common1:amd64 8.57+15.10.20150616-0ubuntu2~gcc5.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Warren Grider (wgrider48) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote : Bug is not a security issue

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private Security → Public
tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.