New upstream version available

Bug #1669933 reported by Rogério Theodoro de Brito
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #1581180: Update to Shotwell 0.26. Edit Remove
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
shotwell (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Hi.

I'm really sorry if I'm making any (social) mistake by using a long habit of reporting wishlist bugs to ubuntu the way that I do it in Debian. Feel free to point me the correct direction of doing it the ubuntu-way...

That being said, Ubuntu's zesty version of shotwell is considerably behind the version that is currently in Debian (testing has upstream version 0.24.5, disguised as 0.25.4+really0.24.5-0.1) while my up-to-date zesty system has only 0.22.0+git20160108.r1.f2fb1f7-0ubuntu3.

Would it be possible to get rid of the delta (as far as feasible) between Debian and Ubuntu?

Thanks,

Rogério Brito.

Revision history for this message
Hans Joachim Desserud (hjd) wrote :

No problem. :)

This has already been reported as bug 1581180 though, so I'll mark this as a duplicate and leave a comment there.

>Would it be possible to get rid of the delta (as far as feasible) between Debian and Ubuntu?

I don't know. The delta looks quite big and seems to contain things like Unity support. I don't know if this has made its way upstream or to Debian...

Revision history for this message
Jens Georg (yg-jensge) wrote :

The problem isn't unity support (that's upstream) but UOA. That should improve with 0.27, unfortunately I didn't find time to finish the UOA implementation for 0.26.

Revision history for this message
Rogério Theodoro de Brito (rbrito) wrote : Re: [Bug 1669933] Re: New upstream version available

Dear Hans and Jens,

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Jens Georg <email address hidden> wrote:
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1581180 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581180

No problems marking the bug as a duplicate. I am still learning my way
around Ubuntu-land after lightly using it a few years ago. :)

> The problem isn't unity support (that's upstream) but UOA. That should
> improve with 0.27, unfortunately I didn't find time to finish the UOA
> implementation for 0.26.

Oh, I see. I read the original bug report and now I see that this is
still being worked on. To the packagers, can we, OTOH, have a version
without that UOA?

BTW, Jens, thank you so very much for maintaining shotwell. It is only
photo manager that I know of that is lightweight even when used
without large desktop environments!

Thanks,

--
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
http://cynic.cc/blog/ : github.com/rbrito : profiles.google.com/rbrito
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.