Activity log for bug #1793894

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2018-09-22 16:04:20 beta-tester bug added bug
2018-09-22 16:07:48 beta-tester description i have a tablet/netbook with: 32bit UEFI (only), SecureBoot enabled, 32/64bit CPU, Windows 10 Pro (32bit). i can't use the 64bit version of ubuntu 18.04.1 or 18.10 (daily-beta) to boot LiveDVD or LiveUSB, because of missing bootia32.efi on the Live iso media. and when i try to add the bootia32.efi by hand, then i get a signed certificate error ar boot time from UEFI i guess. why is the bootx64.efi signed properly for SecureBoot an 64bit UEFI, but bootia32.efi isn't signed properly for SecureBoot an 32bit UEFI??? and why is that bootia32.efi missing at all on the Live iso at all? i am not the only one, who is using that kind of tablet/netbook and want to install ubuntu 18.x 64bit on that device. i don't know if the package i told is the right one. maybe a similar package is more correct... e.g. shim-signed, grub-ia32-signed, grub-amd64-signed, ... i have a tablet/netbook with: 32bit UEFI (only), SecureBoot enabled, 32/64bit CPU, Windows 10 Pro (32bit). i can't use the 64bit version of ubuntu 18.04.1 or 18.10 (daily-beta) to boot LiveDVD or LiveUSB, because of missing bootia32.efi on the Live iso media. and when i try to add the bootia32.efi by hand, then i get a signed certificate error at boot time from UEFI i guess. why is the bootx64.efi signed properly for SecureBoot an 64bit UEFI, but bootia32.efi isn't signed properly for SecureBoot an 32bit UEFI??? and why is that bootia32.efi missing at all on the Live iso? i am not the only one, who is using that kind of tablet/netbook and want to install ubuntu 18.x 64bit on that device. i don't know if the package i told is the right one. maybe another package is more correct... e.g. shim-signed, grub-ia32-signed, grub-amd64-signed, ...
2018-09-25 20:02:35 beta-tester tags bootia32.efi
2018-09-25 20:04:40 beta-tester tags bootia32.efi bootia32.efi grub-efi-ia32 secureboot uefi
2018-09-25 20:06:36 beta-tester description i have a tablet/netbook with: 32bit UEFI (only), SecureBoot enabled, 32/64bit CPU, Windows 10 Pro (32bit). i can't use the 64bit version of ubuntu 18.04.1 or 18.10 (daily-beta) to boot LiveDVD or LiveUSB, because of missing bootia32.efi on the Live iso media. and when i try to add the bootia32.efi by hand, then i get a signed certificate error at boot time from UEFI i guess. why is the bootx64.efi signed properly for SecureBoot an 64bit UEFI, but bootia32.efi isn't signed properly for SecureBoot an 32bit UEFI??? and why is that bootia32.efi missing at all on the Live iso? i am not the only one, who is using that kind of tablet/netbook and want to install ubuntu 18.x 64bit on that device. i don't know if the package i told is the right one. maybe another package is more correct... e.g. shim-signed, grub-ia32-signed, grub-amd64-signed, ... i have a tablet/netbook with: 32bit UEFI (only), SecureBoot enabled, 32/64bit CPU, Windows 10 Pro (32bit). i can't use the 64bit version of ubuntu 18.04.1 or 18.10 (daily-beta) to boot LiveDVD or LiveUSB, because of missing bootia32.efi on the Live iso media. and when i try to add the bootia32.efi by hand, then i get a signed certificate error at boot time from UEFI i guess. why is the bootx64.efi signed properly for SecureBoot an 64bit UEFI, but bootia32.efi isn't signed properly for SecureBoot an 32bit UEFI??? and why is that bootia32.efi missing at all on the Live iso? i am not the only one, who is using that kind of tablet/netbook and want to install ubuntu 18.x 64bit on that device. i don't know if the package i told is the right one. maybe another package is more correct... e.g. shim-signed, grub-efi-ia32-signed, grub-efi-amd64-signed, ...
2018-09-25 20:22:58 Steve Langasek shim-signed (Ubuntu): importance Undecided Wishlist
2019-02-16 14:53:32 beta-tester bug watch added https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909718
2020-09-16 16:38:43 Julian Andres Klode shim-signed (Ubuntu): status New Invalid